1. INTRODUCTION
Medicinal plants are the primary source of bioactive substances with therapeutic potential. Therefore, numerous plant species have been the subject of multiple scientific investigations to elucidate their chemical, pharmacological, and toxicological composition [1,2]. Approximately 54% of the drugs used for cancer treatment and about 64% of medications for hypertension are derived from natural products. However, only 10% of the plant species in the world have been adequately studied [3,4]. In this context, knowledge provided by the ethnopharmacology of particular species fosters research in various areas, such as phytochemistry and pharmacology, to elucidate chemical compounds with pharmacological properties [5,6].
The genus Chamaecrista (Fabaceae) comprises approximately 330 plant species, with over 70% native to the American continent [7]. The occurrence of these plants in South America is particularly significant in Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Paraguay, and Brazil. Brazil exhibits greater species diversity, with approximately 250 cataloged species, mainly in the southeastern region [8,9]. Chamaecrista comprises trees, shrubs, perennial herbs, and woody climbers (lianas). Bipinnate, pinnate, and bifoliolate leaves distinguish them. Their flowers are yellow and zygomorphic, with simple axillary or terminal racemes featuring up to five petals, one of which is banner-shaped and is covered at the base by the others. The fruits are dry and dehiscent along both sutures, and the seeds have an elongated funicular structure, sometimes with an aril [10–13].
The species found in Chamaecrista has been the subject of research because of its relevance in traditional medicine. The leaves of Chamaecrista nigricans are used to treat rheumatic pain, gastrointestinal issues, and fever [14]. The roots, seeds, and leaves of Chamaecrista absus are utilized as cathartics, and the leaves are also indicated for nasal diseases and cough [14]. The leaves of Chamaecrista nictitans are known to relieve leg swelling during pregnancy, whereas the roots are used for treating stomach colic and diarrhea [14], mainly as tea. Other species, such as Chamaecrista flexuosa, whose roots are used to treat renal inflammation [15], along with Chamaecrista duckeana and Chamaecrista diphylla, are noted for their applications as laxatives, anti-inflammatory agents, analgesics, and in the treatment of cutaneous parasitic diseases, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension [15–17]. In addition to its use in traditional medicine, the genus Chamaecrista holds significant value in agriculture, as it is utilized for nitrogen fixation in degraded and nutrient-poor soils, helping to restore them for cultivation [18].
Native plants from the Americas are valuable resources for chemical and pharmacological research focused on the development of novel therapeutics to meet current clinical challenges across diverse diseases. This systematic review provides a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge regarding the pharmacological potential of natural products derived from Chamaecrista species. The compilation of available data on the chemical composition and associated pharmacological activities of the genus Chamaecrista aims to (i) gather the procedures used to identify chemical compounds and (ii) document the pharmacological activities to establish a guide for future research.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Study design
This systematic review followed the PRISMA criteria (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) [19]. The review aimed to answer the following question: What are the pharmacological activities and phytochemical compositions of the genus Chamaecrista plant species reported in the literature? Based on this, the questions involved in population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes were established as follows: Population: Plant species of the genus Chamaecrista; Intervention: Phytochemical composition and pharmacological activity; Comparison: Plant species of the genus without studies on their phytochemical composition and pharmacological activity; Outcomes: Information on the phytochemical composition and pharmacological activity of plant species of the genus Chamaecrista.
The literature search began in October 2022, using the following combinations of keywords: Chamaecrista AND phytochemical composition OR pharmacological, and their respective terms in Spanish and Portuguese. The databases consulted were PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published between 2004 and 2023. In addition, two databases were consulted for identifying synonyms of the scientific names of the species: the Plant List from World Flora Online (WFO), accessible at https://wfoplantlist.org/plant-list/, and GBIF.org (Global Biodiversity Information Facility), available at https://www.gbif.org/species/search.
2.2. Criteria and study selection
Specific inclusion criteria included: (i) type of contribution: only original articles; (ii) language: English, Portuguese, and Spanish; (iii) keywords: present in the title and/or abstract; and (iv) methods used: studies that included methods of extraction, identification of chemical groups, isolation of secondary metabolites, and the evaluation of pharmacological activity of extracts and/or fractions through in vitro and, in vivo assays of any Chamaecrista species. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) articles on plant species belonging to the genus Chamaecrista that mentioned agronomic and/or botanical characteristics; (ii) articles that did not analyze the chemical profile or pharmacological activity of this genus; and (iii) other review articles, meta-analyses, abstracts, conference proceedings, editorials/correspondence, and reports.
The articles were manually examined using the following steps: (i) determining eligibility by considering the title, (ii) reading the abstract based on the criteria, and (iii) conducting a complete reading of the manuscript to exclude those not meeting the inclusion criteria. Subsequently, a consensus was reached among the researchers to resolve any discrepancies in the final selection of manuscripts. We evaluated the evidence concerning possible pharmacological effects and classified each plant extract as follows: (1) presenting potential pharmacological effects when compared to its controls; (2) inconclusive—when studies do not clearly show the data; or (3) evidence does not support plant extract having potential pharmacological effects (Table 2).
Table 1. Scientific names and synonym(s) of reported Chamaecrista species (according to GBIF and WFO'S The Plant List).
| Species | Synonym (GBIF) | Synonyms (WFO Plant List) |
|---|---|---|
| Chamaecrista absus | Cassia absus L. Grimaldia absus (L.) Britton & Rose Senna absus (L.) Roxb. Senna quadrifolia Burm. Cassia foliolis L. Grimaldia absus (L.) Link Cassia exigua Roxb. | Cassia absus L. Grimaldia absus (L.) Britton & Rose Senna absus (L.) Roxb. Senna quadrifolia Burm. Cassia foliolis L. Grimaldia absus (L.) Link Cassia absus Sesse & Moc. |
| Chamaecrista cytisoides | Cassia cytisoides DC. ex Collad. | Cassia cytisoides |
| Chamaecrista desvauxii | Cassia desvauxii Collad. Chamaecrista tetraphylla Britton & Rose ex Britton & Killip Cassia tetraphylla Desv. | Cassia desvauxii Collad. Chamaecrista tetraphylla (Desv.) Britton & Rose ex Britton & Killip Cassia tetraphylla Desv. |
| Chamaecrista diphylla (L.) | Cassia diphylla L. Ononis conjugata Lamb. Ononis conjugata Lamb. ex G.Don Ononis conjugata Sessé & Moc. | Cassia diphylla Ononis conjugata Chamaecrista cultrifolia |
| Chamaecrista duckeana | Cassia duckeana P. Bezerra & A. Fern. | Cassia duckeana |
| Chamaecrista hildebrandtii (Vatke) | Cassia hildebrandtii Vatke Cassia hildebrandtii var. crispata Serrato Cassia grantii var. pilosula J. Léonard | Cassia hildebrandtii Cassia hildebrandtii var. Crispata |
| Chamaecrista mimosoides | Cassia amoena Buch.-Ham. Cassia angustissima Lam. Cassia auricoma var. glabra Ghesq. Cassia capensis var. humifusa Ghesq. Cassia chamaecrista f. auricoma Kuntze Cassia filipendula Bojer Cassia geminata Vahl Cassia gracillima Welw. Cassia guineensis G.Don Cassia hecatophylla DC. Cassia hecatophylla DC. ex Callad. Cassia leschenaultii Wall. Cassia microphylla Willd. Cassia microphylla var. guineensis DC. Cassia microphylla var. senegalensis DC. Cassia mimosoides L. Cassia mimosoides var. glabriuscula Ghesq Cassia myriophylla Wall. Cassia roxburghiana Graham Cassia sensitiva Roxb. Cassia mimosoides var. gracillima (Welw.) Ghesq. Cassia nictitans Sickmann Cassia procumbens Stickman Cassia geminata Vahl ex DC | Cassia amoena Cassia angustissima Cassia auricoma var. glabra Cassia capensis var. humifusa Cassia chamaecrista f. auricoma Cassia filipendula Cassia geminata Cassia gracillima Cassia guineensis Cassia hecatophylla Chamaecrista hecatophylla Cassia leschenaultii Cassia myriophylla Cassia microphylla var. guineensis Cassia microphylla var. senegalensis Cassia mimosoides Cassia mimosoides var. glabriuscula Cassia microphylla Cassia roxburghiana Cassia sensitiva Cassia thunbergiana Cassia procumbens Nictitella mimosoides Senna sensitiva Senna tenella |
| Chamaecrista nictitans | Cassia mimosoides Cordem. Cassia nictitans L. Cassia nictitans L. Cassia nictitans var. conmixta (Pollard & Maxon) Millsp. Chamaecrista millspaughii Pollard Chamaecrista multipinnata Pennell Chamaecrista nictitans var. conmixta Pollard & Maxon Chamaecrista nictitans var. nictitans (L.) Moench | Cassia nictitans Cassia nictitans Cassia nictitans var. conmixta Chamaecrista multipinnata Chamaecrista nictitans subsp. nictitans |
| Chamaecrista nigricans | Cassia harneyi Specht Cassia micrantha Guill. & Perr. Cassia nigricans Vahl Chamaecrista harneyi (Specht) Govaerts | Cassia harneyi Cassia micrantha Cassia nigricans Chamaecrista harneyi |
| Chamaecrista pumila | Cassia prostrata J. Koenig Cassia pumila Lam. Senna prostrata Roxb. Cassia prostrata J. Koenig ex Roxb. | Cassia prostrata Cassia pumila Senna prostrata |
| Chamaecrista repens | Cassia repens Vogel | Cassia repens |
| Chamaecrista vestita | No synonym | No synonym |
Table 2. Assessment of the pharmacological activity of the genus Chamaecrista.
| Plant species | Part used/extract/solvent | Results | Possible pharmacological effectsa | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibacterial | ||||
| Chamaecrista absus | Seeds/oil/petroleum ether | ID: Listeria ivanovii (RBL 30) 10–12 mm, Listeria inocua (RBL 29) 8–10 mm, Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) 9–10 mm, Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6539) 8 mm, Bacillus subtilis (168) 9–12 mm and Bacillus cereus (ATCC 11778) 10 mm. No activity against: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 15442) and Enterococcus hirae (ATCC 10541) | 1 | [46] |
| Chamaecrista cytisoides | Leaves/extract/water:Ethanol | ID: B. subtilis (UFPEDA 86) 14 mm, E. coli (UFPEDA 224) 11 mm, Micrococcus luteus (UFPEDA 100) 21 mm. No activity against: Klebsiella pneumoniae (UFPEDA 396) and S. aureus (UFPEDA 02) | 1 | [33] |
| Branches/extract/water | No antibacterial or antibiofilm activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 35984) | 3 | [33] | |
| Chamaecrista desvauxii | Leaves, fruits/extract/water | At 4 mg/ml of fruit extract, 12.6% biofilm formation of S. epidermidis (ATCC 35984) | 1 | [33] |
| Chamaecrista nigricans | Leaves/extract/water | ID at 100 mg/ml: E. coli (MTCC 1610) 24 mm, P. aeruginosa (MTCC 741) 19.5 mm and K. pneumoniae (MTCC618) 18.5 mm | 1 | [66] |
| Anticholinesterase | ||||
| Chamaecrista mimosoides | Roots/extract/water | IC50: 0.35 ± 0.02 mg/ml | 1 | [16] |
| Roots/extract/dichloromethane:methanol | IC50: 0.03 ± 0.08 mg/ml | 1 | [16] | |
| Antifungal | ||||
| Chamaecrista desvauxii | Leaves, fruits/extract/ethanol (leaves), water (fruits) | ID: Candida albicans (UFPEDA 1007) 15 mm (leaf extract) and 19 mm (fruit extract) | 1 | [33] |
| Leaves/extract/methanol | Fungistatic activity against Trichophyton rubrum (TRU31), fungistatic and fungicidal activity against Epidermophyton floccosum (EPF32) and Trichophyton mentagrophytes (TME22) | 1 | [34] | |
| Chamaecrista nictitans | Leaves/extract/methanol | Fungistatic and fungicidal activity against T. rubrum (TRU31) and E. floccosum (EPF32), fungicidal activity against T. mentagrophytes (TME22) | 1 | [34] |
| Chamaecrista rotundifolia | Leaves/extract/methanol | No activity against T. rubrum (TRU31), E. floccosum (EPF32) and T. mentagrophytes (TME22) | 3 | [34] |
| Chamaecrista vestita | Leaves/extract/methanol | Fungicidal activity against T. rubrum (TRU31) and E. floccosum (EPF32) | 1 | [34] |
| Antioxidant | ||||
| Chamaecrista absus | Seeds/oil/petroleum ether | IC50: 16.78 ± 0.06 μg/ml | 1 | [46] |
| Chamaecrista diphylla | Leaves/extract/water | EC50: 5.42 mg/ml | 1 | [25] |
| Leaves/extract/ethanol | EC50: 0.35 mg/ml | 1 | [25] | |
| Leaves/extract/ethanol | 4.29 ± 0.20 mmol TE/g | 1 | [25] | |
| Leaves/fraction/ethyl acetate | 9.44 ± 0.09 mmol TE/g | 1 | [25] | |
| Leaves/fraction/ethyl acetate | EC50: 0.11 mg/ml | 1 | [72] | |
| Leaves/fraction/ethanol:Water | EC50: 3.86 mg/ml | 1 | [72] | |
| Leaves/fraction/hexane | EC50: 2.62 mg/ml | 1 | [72] | |
| Leaves/fraction/methanol | 6.59 ± 0.27 mmol TE/g | 1 | [25] | |
| Chamaecrista duckeana | Leaves, stems, fruits/extract/methanol | IC50: 165.71 ± 6.94 μg/ml (stem extract), 261.08 ± 2.53 μg/ml (fruit extract) and 283.48 ± 4.19 μg/ml (leaf extract) | 1 | [31] |
| Chamaecrista hildebrandtii (Vatke) | Leaves/extract/methanol | IC50: 8.7 mg/ml | 1 | [32] |
| Chamaecrista mimosoides | Roots/extract/water | IC50 not determined, maximum inhibition less than 50% at maximum concentration evaluated | 3 | [16] |
| Roots/extract/dichloromethane:methanol | IC50: 0.72 ± 0.03 mg/ml and 0.3 ± 0.05 mg/ml | 1 | [16] | |
| Chamaecrista nictitans | Aerial parts/extract/dichloromethane:methanol | ED50: 112.1 μg/μmol | 1 | [35] |
| Aerial parts/oligomeric fraction/bioassay-guided | ED50: 78.6 μg/μmol | 1 | [35] | |
| Aerial parts/polymeric fraction/bioassay-guided | ED50: 115.6 μg/μmol | 1 | [35] | |
| Chamaecrista repens | Aerial parts/extract/methanol | IC50: 2 mg/ml and %AA: 68.3 | 1 | [73] |
| Antiviral | ||||
| Chamaecrista nictitans | Aerial parts/extract/dichloromethane:methanol | CPE100%: 168.75 snd 675 μg/ml against herpes simplex virus (ATCC-VR-733) | 1 | [35] |
| Aerial parts/fraction/water | No inhibition against herpes simplex virus (ATCC-VR-733) | 3 | [35] | |
| Aerial parts/fraction/dichloromethane | CPE100%: 51.56 μg/ml against herpes simplex virus (ATCC-VR-733) | 1 | [35] | |
| Aerial parts/fraction/methanol: Water | CPE50%: 41.41 and 82.81 μg/ml against herpes simplex virus (ATCC-VR-733) | 1 | [35] | |
| Aerial parts/fraction/n-butanol | CPE100%: 76.56 μg/ml against herpes simplex virus (ATCC-VR-733) | 1 | [35] | |
| Aerial parts/oligomeric fraction/bioassay-guided | CPE: 68.7 μg/ml against herpes simplex virus (ATCC-VR-733) | 1 | [35] | |
| Cytotoxicity | ||||
| Chamaecrista duckeana | Leaves, stems, fruits/extract/methanol. | Extracts showed growth inhibition of human tumor cell line HL60 (leukemia) by 86.62%–89.32%. GI% < 58.17 for SNB19 (central nervous system), HCT116 (human colon), and PC3 (prostate) for all three extracts. IC50: 133.4 μmol/ml (fruit extract), 137.3 μmol/ml (stem extract), and >200 μmol/ml (leaf extract) against HL60 (leukemia) IC50: 106.8 μmol/ml (stem extract) and >200 μmol/ml (fruit and leaf extracts) against RAJI (leukemia) | 1 | [31] |
| Antitrypanosomal | ||||
| Chamaecrista mimosoides | Leaves/extract/methanol | Complete cessation of motility of Trypanosoma brucei brucei at 45 minutes (1 mg/ml), 30 minutes (2 mg/ml), and 25 minutes (4 mg/ml) | 1 | [77] |
| Acute toxicity | ||||
| Chamaecrista mimosoides | Whole plant/fraction/ethyl acetate | LD50: 3,808 mg/kg in mice via intraperitoneal route | 1 | [81] |
| Whole plant/fraction/chloroform | LD50: 3,808 mg/kg in mice via intraperitoneal route | 1 | [81] | |
| Whole plant/fraction/n-butanol | LD50: >5,000 mg/kg in mice via intraperitoneal route | 1 | [81] | |
| Chamaecrista repens | Whole plant/extract/methanol | LC50 269.3 μg/ml in Artemia salina | 1 | [73] |
AA = antioxidant activity; CPE = inhibition of cytopathic effect; EC50 = half maximal effective concentration; ED50 = half maximal effective dose; GI% = growth inhibition; ID = inhibition diameter; IC50 = half maximal inhibitory concentration; LD50 = median lethal dose; LC50 = median lethal concentration; TE = trolox equivalents.
a(1) Presenting potential pharmacological effects, (2) inconclusive, or (3) the evidence does not support the extract having potential pharmacological effects.
2.3. Data extraction
Initially, the records were evaluated by two reviewers, Domitila Villalba Fariña and Melissa Escobar Avalos (D.V.F. and M.E.A.), with one reviewer (D.V.F.) responsible for the search and selection process, while the second reviewer (M.E.A.) conducted an independent assessment. The data from the literature search were extracted and organized into templates, including year of publication, country where the study was conducted, plant species, part of the plant used, extraction method, isolated chemical compounds, and evaluation of pharmacological activity. For the latter, extracts and/or fractions, concentrations, methods employed (encompassing both in vitro and in vivo experimental models), and results are included. Using a free interactive map generator, a location map was created based on the absolute frequency of articles published in the genus (www.mapinseconds.com). Microsoft Excel® (version 365) was used to generate graphs. Chemical molecules were designed using ACD/ChemSketch FREEWARE 2020 1.2.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
During the literature search, 1,855 articles were obtained. Google Scholar was the database with the most articles (n = 1,837) and the only one that provided information in all three selected languages (English, Spanish, and Portuguese). In contrast, the other databases only presented articles in English.
In the first stage, 1,673 articles were excluded because they did not meet the initial criteria. In addition, 20 duplicates reported in more than one database were removed. Subsequently, 123 articles were excluded based on the reading of the abstracts, leaving 39 articles, of which nine were excluded due to inaccessibility. Eighteen articles were considered for full reading at the end of the selection process. This process of identifying and selecting the articles is presented in Figure 1.
![]() | Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram for article selection. [Click here to view] |
In Figure 2, the geographical map shows the countries where studies on the chemical-pharmacological analysis of the genus Chamaecrista have been reported. Brazil had the highest number of recorded articles (n = 7), followed by Costa Rica (n = 3), India (n = 3), Nigeria (n = 2), Kenya (n = 1), South Africa (n = 1), and Tunisia (n = 1). The geographical variability and number of published articles can be attributed to the notable and greater diversity of species that prevail in warm regions, such as Brazil.
![]() | Figure 2. Geographic distribution of research on the chemical composition and pharmacological activity of the genus Chamaecrista. [Click here to view] |
The first record of scientific publications on the genus Chamaecrista dates back to 2004, with no articles found before this period. The first peak of publications occurred in 2014, followed by a steady period between 2019 and 2021 (n = 2) (Fig. 3A). This indicates that, despite time, the exploration of the chemical composition and pharmacological properties of this genus is limited.
![]() | Figure 3. Number of articles selected for the systematic review: A) based on the year of publication, and B) according to the study of pharmacological activity and/or chemical composition. [Click here to view] |
Regarding chemical and pharmacological investigations, C. mimosoides and C. nictitans had the highest reports. However, for C. cytisoides, C. pumila, and C. repens, only studies on their pharmacological properties are available, with no data on their chemical composition (Fig. 3B).
Considering the correlation between chemical composition and pharmacological activity, highlighting the importance and necessity of combining both evaluations underscores the utility and significance of this genus as a potential source of therapeutic agents. In addition, given the multiple botanical nomenclatures for the same species within the genus Chamaecrista observed in the selected articles, data compiled from databases for synonym identification are presented in Table 1.
3.1. Phytochemical aspects
The leaves were the most commonly used for obtaining extracts, accounting for 48%, followed by the aerial parts (including branches, leaves, and stems) at 28%. The remaining percentages were distributed among the fruits (12%), roots (8%), and seeds (4%), although in smaller proportions. Phytochemical analysis revealed the presence of 159 compounds distributed across different species and tissues of Chamaecrista, with phenolic compounds (78%), fatty acids, and aliphatic esters (8%) as the main groups of identified secondary metabolites, followed by sterols, anthraquinones, and other compounds ( Fig. 4).
![]() | Figure 4. Groups of identified secondary metabolites from the genus Chamaecrista. [Click here to view] |
3.1.1. Phenolic compounds
Phenolic compounds are widely distributed in the plant kingdom and have garnered significant scientific interest in recent years because of their antioxidant capacity, which neutralizes free radicals in the body [20,21]. This phenomenon has significant health implications, as it is associated with a reduced risk of heart disease, cancer, and other disorders linked to oxidative stress [22,23]. In addition to their antioxidant activity, phenolic compounds exhibit various beneficial properties, including anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, antimicrobial, and antiviral activities [22,23].
Among the identified phenolic compounds, notable groups included flavones, phenolic acids, flavonols, flavanones, flavanonol derivatives, coumarins, and isocoumarins.
Quirós-Guerrero et al. [24] reported the highest number of identified phenolic compounds in Chamaecrista, using liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-QTOF-MS) in negative ionization mode from a methanolic extract of aerial parts. They identified a total of 44 metabolites in the species C. nictitans, of which 70% were reported for the first time for this species, as shown in Figure 5 as compounds 6, 7, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 25, 27-32, 41, 44–46, 48–50, 54, 55, 65, 67–69.
![]() | Figure 5. Phenolic compounds reported in species of Chamaecrista. [Click here to view] |
Phenolic compounds have been identified in the ethanolic extract and ethyl acetate fraction of C. diphylla leaves using ultra-high-resolution liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry [25]. Among these, sinapic acid (38) was identified, which shows antibacterial, antihyperglycemic, hepatoprotective, anti-inflammatory, and potentially anticancer properties [26]. Resveratrol (70) is known for its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects and ability to protect the cardiovascular system. It has been the subject of numerous studies [27–29]. These findings underscore the richness of phenolic compounds present in C. nictitans. However, the identification of these compounds has been reported in only two species. It is crucial to emphasize the importance of your continued research on other species of the genus Chamaecrista, as it is integral to advancing our understanding of these beneficial compounds.
Flavonoids constitute a vast chemical group of various plant species and are classified into flavones, flavonols, flavanones, isoflavonoids, anthocyanidins, and catechins. They exhibit various pharmacological properties, including antioxidant, diuretic, antispasmodic, antiulcer, and anti-inflammatory [30]. In the studies analyzed, 35% of the chemical groups identified in Chamaecrista species corresponded to flavonoids. For instance, a study on C. duckeana identified 17 flavonoids in methanolic extracts from the stems, roots, fruits, and leaves using UPLC-ESI-HRMS [31]. Most (47%) of these flavonoids were found in the stem extracts (compounds 80, 82, 84, 87, 90, 92, 104, and 113, Table S1), detailed in Figure 5. In comparison, the remaining 47% were distributed among the leaves (compounds 100, 114, and 118, Table S1) and fruit extracts (compounds 84, 85, 111, 115, and 117, Table S1). Another species, C. hildebrandtii, presented 13 compounds, including flavonoids and phenolic derivatives (72, 74, 76, 83, 88, 91, 96, 98, 101, 103, 107–110, Table S1) identified via LC-QTOF-MS in methanolic leaf extracts [32].
Certain compounds have also been identified in several Chamaecrista species. For example, vitexin (119), reported in extracts from C. rotundifolia, C. desvauxii, and C. diphylla, exhibits antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects and is particularly relevant in cosmetology for potential anti-aging benefits [33,34]. In addition, two flavonoids, apigenin, and luteolin, are present in both C. diphylla and C. nictitans extracts [25,35]. Apigenin (79) has antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer effects, particularly by inhibiting the proliferation of cancer cells in the ovaries, prostate, and colon [36–38]. Luteolin (97) demonstrates various effects, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cardiovascular, anti-cancer, and anti-neurodegenerative properties [38–40]. Isovitexin (94) has been identified in several species, such as C. desvauxii, C. diphylla, C. nictitans, and C. rotundifolia, displays anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, and is particularly beneficial in skincare and anti-aging treatments. Among the flavonoids identified in extracts of C. desvauxii, C. nictitans, and C. rotundifolia, quercetin (112) has been widely studied for its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and potential anticancer properties [41–43].
Chemical analysis of the Chamaecrista genus has revealed a richness of flavonoids, suggesting its potential application in various fields such as food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical development. Despite promising research, information remains limited to this genus, and this review represents an initial step toward studying other species within the genus based on reported findings.
3.1.2. Sterols
Sterols are a group of lipids that play crucial roles in the structure of cell membranes and the regulation of various biological processes. They can originate from multiple sources, including animals, plants, and fungi. Those derived from plants are known as phytosterols, which are significant in cholesterol absorption and hormone synthesis. In addition, phytosterols have been observed to exhibit anti-inflammatory, antitumor, and antimicrobial effects, highlighting their broad therapeutic potential in various health areas [44,45].
They were primarily identified in the seed oil of C. absus, representing 5% of the total chemical groups identified in this genus (Table S1), as shown in Figure 6. Notably, three major phytosterols were present: campesterol (124), stigmasterol (127), and β-sitosterol (121), with β-sitosterol being the most abundant. The analysis was performed using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) [46].
![]() | Figure 6. Sterols reported in genus Chamaecrista. [Click here to view] |
β-sitosterol is utilized as a nutritional supplement and is recognized for its therapeutic potential, including antioxidant, analgesic, antimicrobial, antidiabetic, and hepatoprotective effects, underscoring its multiple health benefits [47,48].
3.1.3. Fatty acids and aliphatic esters
Fatty acids are essential for human and animal diets and play crucial roles in various physiological functions, such as energy production and cell membrane formation. They are classified as saturated, unsaturated, and polyunsaturated, and balanced consumption promotes optimal cardiovascular health [49]. On the other hand, aliphatic esters are compounds of significant industrial and commercial importance, used as solvents and lubricants in food products, cosmetics, and fragrances. Their versatile properties make them highly valuable in the industry.
Two species, C. absus and C. nigricans, have reported the presence of two fatty acids: n-hexadecanoic acid (compound 133, Table S1) and octadecanoic acid (compound 139, Table S1). In addition, three essential fatty acids were identified in C. absus: α-linolenic acid (Ω 3), linoleic acid (Ω 6), and oleic acid (Ω 9), as shown in Figure 7 [46,50].
![]() | Figure 7. Fatty acids and aliphatic esters reported in genus Chamaecrista. [Click here to view] |
Alpha-linolenic acid is known for its beneficial properties in preventing and treating cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases [51]. It also shows potential anti-inflammatory effects, with preliminary trials reporting its supplementation in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection to combat inflammation [52]. Moreover, it has been included in the feed of both ruminant and non-ruminant animals, along with linoleic and oleic acids, resulting in improved meat quality in rabbits and poultry, increased egg mass in birds, and enhanced milk quality [53].
Furthermore, the percentage of α-linolenic acid reported in the oil was similar to that found in soybean oil (7%) and slightly lower than that in canola oil (9%), suggesting that it could be a viable alternative [54]. For these reasons, further research on Chamaecrista species is of interest.
3.1.4. Anthraquinones
Anthraquinones are a group of compounds that are widely distributed in nature and found in the roots, leaves, and flowers. These compounds are classified as quinones, benzoquinones, and naphthoquinones. They are known for their pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory, antitumor, antimicrobial, and laxative effects [55,56].
Anthraquinones have been reported in three species: C. duckeana, C. nigricans, and C. diphylla, as determined by Ultra-High-Performance liquid chromatography (UPLC-ESI-HRMS), Electron Ionization Mass Spectrometry-m/z, Infrared spectroscopy, and 13C and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectrocopy techniques, detailed in Figure 8, respectively (Table S1) [25,31,50].
![]() | Figure 8. Anthraquinones reported in genus Chamaecrista. [Click here to view] |
Emodin (compound 143, Table S1) has been detected in the leaves of C. diphylla and C. nigricans. Its pharmacological properties include anti-inflammatory, antimutagenic, antimicrobial, antidiabetic, and neuroprotective properties, which help prevent diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s [57,58].
3.1.5. Other chemical compounds
Finally, it is worth mentioning that compounds within the following groups have been reported: triterpene alcohols, xanthone derivatives, triterpene derivatives, and sesquiterpenes, which are compiled in Table S1.
Compounds 146, 149, 150, 152–154, and 157–159 were found in the leaves of C. diphylla, and compounds 147, 155, and 156 were found in the fruits of C. duckeana. The latter was also identified in the stem using UPLC-ESI-HRMS [25,31].
In contrast, compounds 145 and 151 have been reported in the seeds of C. absus using GC-FID and in the leaves of C. nigricans (compound 148) using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry [46,50].
Among the compounds identified in the genus is β-amyrin, compound 145 ( Fig. 9) reported in C. absus, which decreases blood glucose levels in mice and increases insulin levels [59].
![]() | Figure 9. Other chemical compounds reported in different species of Chamaecrista. [Click here to view] |
Another compound reported was eupalinolide A (156) in the stems and fruits of C. duckeana. This compound has been studied for its potential anti-inflammatory and antitumor effects [60].
Azelaic acid was identified in the leaf extracts of C. diphylla. It has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antibacterial properties and acne-inhibiting effects and is used to develop cosmetic products [61].
In conclusion, it is essential to highlight the significance of studies on chemical groups reported for the genus Chamaecrista. This genus has gained relevance since a previous review noted some species, emphasizing the importance of Chamaecrista [62]. Even so, it is necessary to continue with future research because 40% of the identified compounds do not report studies on their pharmacological properties, and other chemical groups, such as alkaloids, which have been reported in species belonging to the same subfamily Caesalpinoideae, have not been studied in Chamaecrista. These may represent promising research fields, expanding the knowledge of the pharmacological properties that they may present and their potential applications in health.
In conclusion, advancing the identification and isolation of chemical compounds in Chamaecrista species is essential, especially considering that only one of the studies reviewed has undertaken a comprehensive chemical analysis [24]. The remaining works are largely limited to preliminary identification efforts.
Nevertheless, the field offers significant opportunities for future research. Notably, around 40% of the compounds identified so far have not been investigated for their pharmacological activities. Furthermore, chemical groups such as alkaloids, well-documented in other species within the Caesalpinoideae subfamily, have yet to be explored in Chamaecrista. Addressing these gaps could unlock valuable pharmacological insights and open new pathways for applications in health and medicine. We encourage further multidisciplinary collaborations to fully realize the potential of Chamaecrista species in drug discovery and development [63,64].
3.2. Pharmacological activity of the genus Chamaecrista
The preclinical pharmacological properties reported in the selected scientific literature of the extracts and their fractions of various species of this genus have been compiled, with a total of seven properties, where antimicrobial and antioxidant activities stand out, with 36% each.
Chamaecrista spp. are traditionally used in folk medicine and exhibit various pharmacological properties. Based on the studies included in this review, the most frequently reported activities were antimicrobial and antioxidant (each accounting for 36% of the studies), followed by cytotoxic and antiviral activities (8% each), and antitrypanosomal, anticholinesterase, and acute toxicity effects (4% each) (Table 2).
3.2.1. Antimicrobial activity
The increasing resistance to conventional antimicrobial agents, mainly owing to their overuse in medicine and agriculture, poses a significant public health challenge, contributing to high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. This issue also leads to increased healthcare costs and frequent therapeutic failures. Moreover, antimicrobial therapies themselves can cause severe adverse effects, and the use of specific agents is restricted owing to their toxicity [65].
Oil extracted from C. absus seeds exhibited antibacterial activity against a range of gram-positive bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria ivanovii, Listeria innocua, Bacillus subtilis, and Bacillus cereus, as well as the gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli. The most vigorous activity was observed against L. ivanovii and B. subtilis, with an inhibition zone reaching up to 12 mm, possibly owing to sterols and triterpenoid alcohols in the seed oil [46]. The aqueous extract of C. nigricans leaves, when combined with iron oxide nanoparticles, demonstrated enhanced antibacterial efficacy, producing inhibition of 24 mm against E. coli, 19.5 mm Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 18.5 mm Klebsiella pneumoniae at a concentration of 100 μg/ ml [66]. Similarly, the leaf extract of C. cytisoides displayed notable antibacterial activity, particularly against Micrococcus luteus (21 mm), and inhibited the growth of B. subtilis and E. coli. The comparatively lower activity of many extracts against gram-negative bacteria may be explained by their outer membrane, which acts as an additional barrier to antimicrobial agents [34]. At a concentration of 4 mg/ml, the fruit extract of C. desvauxii inhibited Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation (12.6%). Staphylococcus epidermidis is closely associated with nosocomial infections, and inhibiting virulence factors such as biofilm formation presents an innovative therapeutic approach [33].
Regarding antifungal activity, extracts of C. desvauxii showed inhibition against Candida albicans, with fruit extract being the most effective (19 mm) [34]. These results suggest that different plant parts may exhibit distinct antimicrobial profiles, likely owing to variations in their chemical composition. The methanolic leaf extracts of C. desvauxii, C. nictitans, and Chamaecrista vestita demonstrated both fungistatic and fungicidal activity against dermatophytes such as Trichophyton rubrum, Epidermophyton floccosum, and Trichophyton mentagrophytes at 500 mg/ml, indicating strong anti-dermatophyte potential [34].
The antimicrobial efficacy of Chamaecrista extracts appears to be influenced by the presence and degree of hydroxylation of the phenolic compounds. Nevertheless, there is a notable gap in studies on antifungal activity within this genus, highlighting the need for further research. Natural products from Chamaecrista offer considerable promise owing to their chemical diversity, particularly phenolics with known antifungal properties. Future studies should focus on the isolation and characterization of bioactive compounds, elucidating their mechanisms of action, evaluation using in vivo models, structure-activity relationship studies, and exploration of chemical modifications. Investigating the potential synergistic effects between plant extracts or conventional antimicrobial agents may also reveal new approaches to overcoming microbial resistance.
3.2.2. Anticholinesterase activity
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder and the primary cause of dementia worldwide. Current treatments are primarily symptomatic, with acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors being the most widely prescribed. These agents inhibit AChE, thereby increasing acetylcholine levels in the brain and enhancing cognitive function through prolonged neurotransmitter availability [67]. However, many of the existing inhibitors have limitations such as adverse side effects, poor bioavailability, and insufficient modulation of acetylcholine levels to achieve a complete therapeutic effect. This has driven ongoing research into the discovery of new AChE inhibitors, particularly those derived from natural sources that may offer better efficacy and safety profiles.
In this regard, Adewusi et al. [16] reported that root extracts of C. mimosoides exhibited significant AChE inhibitory activity. Notably, the organic extract demonstrated the lowest IC50 value (0.03 mg/ml), in contrast to the aqueous extract (0.35 mg/ml), indicating stronger inhibition of the enzyme [16]. The increased activity observed in the organic extract may be due to the greater efficiency of the organic solvents in extracting bioactive compounds with anticholinesterase potential.
Flavonoids, which are abundant in various Chamaecrista species, are natural compounds known for their anticholinesterase properties. Their occurrence in this genus highlights the relevance of further exploration of Chamaecrista as a promising source of new candidates for developing alternative or complementary therapies for AD.
3.2.3. Antioxidant activity
Antioxidants are compounds capable of mitigating oxidative stress by regulating free radicals formation, scavenging reactive species, halting chain reactions, and preventing lipid peroxidation. Free radicals, such as reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species, can damage biomolecules, contributing to the pathogenesis of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes, and cancer [68]. Given their therapeutic potential, natural antioxidants represent a promising alternative to synthetic compounds, which are often associated with undesirable side effects, making their identification and development of natural antioxidants essential for the prevention and treatment of human diseases and for promoting overall health [69]. The phenolic compounds possess structural features such as hydroxyl groups capable of donating hydrogen atoms, which are key to neutralizing free radicals by cleaving the O–H bond, thereby explaining their high antioxidant capacity [70,71].
The seed oil of C. absus exhibited remarkable free radical scavenging capacity with an IC50 value of 16.78 μg/ml, suggesting the presence of hydrogen-donating constituents capable of efficiently neutralizing DPPH radicals. A study by Reis et al. [72] evaluated the antioxidant activity of C. diphylla using the DPPH method, which revealed significant variations among the different extracts and fractions. The ethyl acetate fraction demonstrated the highest activity, with a CE50 value of 0.11 mg/ml, surpassing the ascorbic acid standard (0.13 mg/ml). The ethanolic extract also exhibited notable activity (CE50: 0.35 mg/ml) [72]. These results correlated with the high content of phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and condensed tannins in both samples.
Similarly, Gomes et al. [25] confirmed the antioxidant potential of C. diphylla, reporting that the ethyl acetate fraction of its leaves had the highest activity (9.44 mmol ET/g) according to the oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay, followed by the methanolic and ethanolic fractions (6.59 and 4.29 mmol ET/g, respectively). The higher antioxidant activity in the fractions than in the crude extract suggests bioactive compound enrichment during the fractionation process [25].
In the case of C. duckeana, the methanolic extract of the stems displayed the highest antioxidant activity, with an IC50 value of 165.71 μg/ml surpassing the standard synthetic antioxidant butylated hydroxytoluene, which had an IC50 of 175.18 μg/ ml [31]. Similarly, the methanolic extract of C. hildebrandtii leaves exhibited potent antioxidant activity (IC50: 8.7 mg/ml), likely due to the synergistic action of various secondary metabolites [32]. The organic extract of C. mimosoides roots showed potent antioxidant activity against 2.2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2’-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothaizoline-6-sulfonic acid) radicals, with low IC50 values of 0.72 and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively [16].
In addition, the radical scavenging activity of the phenolic fractions of C. nictitans was analyzed. The oligomeric fraction demonstrated the highest activity (DE50: 78.6 μg/μmol), while the polymeric fraction showed values similar to the crude extract (DE50: 115.6 and 112.1 μg/μmol, respectively) [35]. In C. repens, the methanolic extract displayed 68.3% antioxidant activity in the β-carotene bleaching assay, whereas its DPPH radical scavenging capacity yielded an IC50 of 2 mg/ ml [73].
Chamaecrista species are promising natural antioxidant sources, primarily attributed to the presence of polyphenolic compounds, particularly flavonoids.
3.2.4. Antiviral activity
Viral infections cause various chronic and acute diseases in humans and animals. These infections are associated with high morbidity and mortality in humans [74]. Current antiviral drugs present several problems, such as high costs, drug resistance, safety concerns, and limitations in efficacy. Viral replication poses a unique challenge, as targeting the virus without harming the host cells is difficult. Viral variability, particularly in RNA viruses, and accumulated genetic mutations contribute to drug resistance, leading researchers to develop new antiviral options [15,35,74]. Emerging and re-emerging viruses represent a significant problem in viral pathogenesis, leading to outbreaks, epidemics, and pandemics. A current example is COVID-19, which is caused by the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and has impacted global social and economic conditions. Therefore, searching for new antiviral agents is crucial, and natural products offer valuable sources of novel chemical compounds with antiviral activity. Numerous preclinical studies have identified natural products with potential in vitro and in vivo antiviral activities, some of which have progressed to clinical trials for drug development [74,75].
However, the antiviral activity of Chamaecrista has not been exhaustively investigated. So far, only C. nictitans has been evaluated for its antiviral properties against herpes simplex virus (HSV ). This virus, which is globally distributed, remains a significant public health issue, infecting 45% –98% of the world’s population[74]. Uribe et al. [15] suggest effective antiviral action, as a dose-dependent effect was recorded as the inhibitory effect of the extract. This activity was attributed to the polar components, initially identified in the aqueous methanolic fraction and later in the dichloromethane and butanol fractions, with inhibition of cytopathic effect (CPE) values ranging from 41.41 to 76.56 μg/ml. The crude extract also exhibited antiviral activity, with a CPE value of 168.75 μg/ml.
Mateos-Martín et al. [35] observed that the oligomeric fraction, at a concentration of 68.7 μg/ml, was the most effective among the analyzed fractions. They suggested that this fraction of C. nictitans extract exerts its action through a particularly effective combination of proanthocyanidins, which have two structural characteristics: monohydroxyphenolic structures and type A linkages. These have been associated with antiviral effects, primarily through inhibiting late transcription. C. nictitans exhibits antiviral properties and acts against herpes simplex virus (HSV), which can be attributed to the presence of polyphenolic compounds. Although acyclovir inhibits the secondary transcription of the virus, the extract of this species inhibits two stages of the HSV replication cycle, adsorption, and secondary transcription, exerting its action intracellularly [15,35,74].
These findings suggested that C. nictitans has therapeutic potential. The structural characterization and isolation of biomolecules are crucial for studying their absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity properties. As a new natural source for preventing and treating viral diseases, further studies are required.
3.2.5. Antitrypanosomal activity
Trypanosomiasis is caused by a protozoan parasite belonging to the genus Trypanosoma. It is primarily responsible for chronic anthroponotic infections in West and Central Africa and can have severe consequences if not treated adequately [69]. Furthermore, it is classified as a neglected infectious disease, primarily affecting populations in developing countries that receive limited attention in the research and development of new treatments despite its significant impact on public health. Treatment options are limited, underscoring the need for further research to improve the therapeutic possibilities [76].
Only one report has documented the anti-trypanosomal properties of this genus. The crude methanolic extract of C. mimosoides leaves showed significant cessation of parasite motility with increased incubation time and extract concentration. Complete cessation of Trypanosoma brucei brucei motility was observed within 25 minutes at the highest concentration evaluated (4 mg/ml) [77]. These findings indicate that the extract of this species possesses notable in vitro antitrypanosomal activity, which could be attributed to its phytoconstituents, such as flavonoids, terpenes, sterols, and polyphenols. This suggests that these compounds represent a promising source for in vivo treatment of trypanosomiasis [77].
3.2.6. Cytotoxicity
Cancer poses a significant challenge to the global public health. Global demographic trends suggest an increase in cancer incidence in the coming decades, with projections indicating more than 20 million new cases annually by 2025 [78]. Chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of clinical cancer treatment. However, this therapeutic strategy is hindered by challenges, such as tumor heterogeneity, side effects, toxicity, and acquired multidrug resistance, which limit its therapeutic efficacy. Consequently, searching for drugs with reduced toxicity and improved efficacy is a critical priority in medical research. Between 1981 and 2019, approximately 25% of all newly approved cancer drugs were derived from natural products, underscoring the immense potential of this rich resource [79].
Lima et al. [31] demonstrated that methanolic extracts of C. duckeana exhibited over 80% inhibition of cell growth in HL60 leukemia cells and less than 58.17% inhibition against SNB19 (central nervous system), HCT116 (human colon), and PC3 (prostate) cell lines. Stems showed notable cytotoxicity with IC50 values of 137.3 and 106.8 μmol/ ml for HL60 and RAJI cells, respectively. These findings highlight the potential of extracts from this plant species for their promising antitumor and cytotoxic activities [31]. The observed cytotoxicity may be attributed to the presence of the sesquiterpene Eupalinolide A in C. duckeana extracts, which has been noted in the literature for its potent cytotoxic activity [79].
However, further preclinical and clinical studies are required to confirm the anticancer effects of C. duckeana. Once the active compounds responsible for anticancer activity have been identified, such studies could explore the antitumor mechanisms of its constituents. These compounds could serve as promising candidates for developing new cancer treatments or for use in complementary therapies alongside conventional approaches.
3.2.7. Acute toxicity
Acute toxicity testing is generally the first step in assessing the toxicity of a substance. It provides crucial information on the health risks associated with short-term exposure to substances such as drugs. Moreover, these studies can identify early signs of potentially serious adverse effects, enabling the implementation of appropriate preventive measures such as dose adjustments. Such research is paramount before using the substance and lays the groundwork for future clinical toxicity studies [80].
Very few toxicity studies have been conducted in the genus Chamaecrista. Among them, Medugu et al. [81] evaluated the acute toxicity of C. mimosoides extract fractions in mice via the intraperitoneal route, obtaining LD50 values >5,000 mg/kg for the butanol fraction and 3,808 mg/kg for the chloroform and ethyl acetate fractions. These results suggest the low toxicity of the evaluated fractions, with LD50 values ≥1,500 mg/kg.
David et al. [73] conducted an acute toxicity assessment of the methanolic extract of C. repens, obtaining an LC50 value of 269.3 μg/ ml in Artemia salina. Extracts with LC50 values above 200 mg/l in the A. salina lethality assay were considered low toxicity.
Continued investigation of the toxicity of natural product extracts, particularly those with pharmacological activity, is essential for developing Natural Product-Based Libraries. These studies play a critical role in comprehensively evaluating the safety profiles of bioactive compounds, thereby ensuring safe and effective drug discovery [82].
4. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
A review of the genus Chamaecrista underscores its therapeutic potential while revealing critical research gaps. Phytochemical studies have identified a diverse array of bioactive compounds, including flavonoids (e.g., vitexin, luteolin, and quercetin), polyphenols, terpenoids, and anthraquinones, which contribute to their antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiviral, cytotoxic, anticholinesterase, and antitrypanosomal activities. Notably, C. nictitans and C. duckeana exhibited the most robust pharmacological evidence, with flavonoids and sesquiterpenes, such as eupalinolide A, linked to their antioxidant and cytotoxic effects. However, despite these promising findings, over 40% of the identified compounds remain pharmacologically uncharacterized. Key chemical groups, such as alkaloids, well-documented in related genera, are yet to be explored in Chamaecrista.
A significant limitation of the current study is its heavy reliance on in vitro assays. For instance, while C. nictitans shows promising antiviral activity against HSV, and C. duckeana demonstrates cytotoxicity against leukemia cells (HL60); these effects lack validation in vivo models. Translational applications are hindered by the absence of safety and efficacy profiles in physiological contexts. Thus, future studies must prioritize in vivo preclinical research to elucidate the mechanisms, assess toxicity, and establish dosage parameters as a foundation for clinical trials.
This review highlights Chamaecrista as a chemically rich and pharmacologically versatile genus with an untapped potential. This study provides a roadmap for future research to unlock novel therapeutic alternatives by bridging traditional uses, phytochemical diversity, and observed bioactivities. Addressing these gaps could position Chamaecrista as a valuable resource for drug discovery and innovation in herbal medicine.
5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge and appreciate BioProsNat (Grupo de Investigación en Bioprospección de Productos Naturales) and RIIMICO (Red Iberoamericana de Investigadores en Micología) for facilitating interdisciplinary synergies among researchers, thereby enhancing the depth and breadth of our scientific inquiry.
6. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
All authors made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; took part in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreed to submit to the current journal; gave final approval of the version to be published; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All the authors are eligible to be an author as per the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requirements/guidelines.
7. FINANCIAL SUPPORT
This research was co-funded by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT) with the support of the FEEI under grant number PINV01-91. The funding organization does not affect transparency or the review findings.
8. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors report no financial or any other conflicts of interest in this work.
9. ETHICAL APPROVALS
This study does not involve experiments on animals or human subjects.
10. DATA AVAILABILITY
All the data is available with the authors and shall be provided upon request.
11. PUBLISHER’S NOTE
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. This journal remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.
12. USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGY
The authors declare that they have not used artificial intelligence (AI)-tools for writing and editing of the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.
REFERENCES
1. Cragg GM, Newman DJ. Natural products: a continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochim Biophys Acta - Gen Subj. 2013;1830:3670–95. CrossRef
2. Lutfi MF. The physiological basis and clinical significance of lung volume measurements. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2017;12:1–12. CrossRef
3. Yuan H, Ma Q, Ye L, Piao G. The traditional medicine and modern medicine from natural products. Molecules 2016;21:559. CrossRef
4. Bermúdez A, Oliveira-Miranda MA, Velázquez D. La investigación etnobotánica sobre plantas medicinales: una revisión de sus objetivos y enfoques actuales alexis bermúdez, maría a. Oliveira-miranda. Interciencia 2005;30:453–9.
5. Harvey AL. Natural products in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 2008;13:894–901. CrossRef
6. Simões CMO, Schenkel EP, Gozman G, Melo JCP de. Farmacognosia da planta ao medicamento. 6th ed. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Editora UFRGS; 2007.
7. Lewis G, Polhill R. A situacao atual da sistematica de Leguminosae neotropicais. Cong Latin Bot. 1998;113–45.
8. da Silva WL, da Rocha AE, dos Santos JUM. Leguminosae em savanas do estuário amazônico brasileiro. Rodriguésia 2014;65:329–53. CrossRef
9. Forzza RC, Leitman PM, Costa A, de Carvalho AA Jr, Peixoto AL, Walter BMT, et al. Catálogo de plantas e fungos do Brasil - Vol. 1.JBRJ (Botanical garden of Rio de Janeiro), Vol. 2; 2010.
10. Arroyo M, Bohlen C, Cavieres C, Marticorena C. Guía de consultas diversidad vegetal. Facena (Unne) 2002;1:122–41.
11. Rodrigues RS, Flores AS, Miotto STS, de Moura Baptista LR. The genus senna (Leguminosae, caesalpinioideae) in Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil. Acta Bot Brasilica 2005;19:1–16. CrossRef
12. Queiroz RT de, Loiola MIB. O gênero Chamaecrista Moench (Caesalpinioideae) em áreas do entorno do Parque Estadual das Dunas de Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil. Hoehnea 2009;36:725–36. CrossRef
13. Irwin H, Barneby R. Cassieae bronn. Advance in legumes systematics. London, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens; 1981. pp. 97–106.
14. Osunga S, Amuka O, Machocho AK, Getabu A. Ethnobotany of some members of the genus Cassia (Senna). Int J Novel Res Life Sci. 2023;10:1–14.
15. Uribe LH, Olarte EC, Castillo GT. In vitro antiviral activity of Chamaecrista nictitans (Fabaceae) against herpes simplex virus: biological characterization of mechanisms of action. Rev Biol Trop. 2004;52:807–16.
16. Adewusi EA, Moodley N, Steenkamp V. Antioxidant and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of selected southern African medicinal plants. South African J Bot. 2011;77:638–44. CrossRef
17. Delle Monache G, Cristina De Rosa M, Scurria R, Monacelli B, Pasqua G, Dall’Olio G, et al. Metabolites from in vitro cultures of Cassia didymobotrya. Phytochemistry 1991;30:1849–54. CrossRef
18. Nguyen VQ. Symbiosis between Chamaecrista fasciculata and nitrogen-fixing Symbiosis between Chamaecrista fasciculata and nitrogen-fixing bacteria: a review. JBRJ (Botanical garden of Rio de Janeiro), 2019.
19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Academia and clinic annals of internal medicine preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.
20. Yan Z, Zhong Y, Duan Y, Chen Q, Li F. Antioxidant mechanism of tea polyphenols and its impact on health benefits. Anim Nutr. 2020;6:115–23. CrossRef
21. Singh A, Yau YF, Leung KS, El-Nezami H, Lee JCY. Interaction of polyphenols as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds in brain–liver–gut axis. Antioxidants 2020;9:1–20. CrossRef
22. Salido FP. En Farmacia. Offarm 2005;24:178.
23. Haida Z, Hakiman M. A comprehensive review on the determination of enzymatic assay and nonenzymatic antioxidant activities. Food Sci Nutr. 2019;7:1555–63. CrossRef
24. Quirós-Guerrero L, Albertazzi F, Araya-Valverde E, Romero RM, Villalobos H, Poveda L, et al. Phenolic variation among Chamaecrista nictitans subspecies and varieties revealed through UPLC-ESI(-)-MS/MS chemical fingerprinting. Metabolomics 2019;15:14. CrossRef
25. Gomes P, Quirós-Guerrero L, Muribeca A, Reis J, Pamplona S, Lima AH, et al. Constituents of Chamaecrista diphylla (L.) greene leaves with potent antioxidant capacity: a feature-based molecular network dereplication approach. Pharmaceutics 2021;13:681. CrossRef
26. Nancy P, Ashlesha V. Pharmacognostic and phytochemical studies of Cassia absus seed extracts. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2016;8:325–32.
27. Gowd V, Kanika, Jori C, Chaudhary AA, Rudayni HA, Rashid S, et al. Resveratrol and resveratrol nano-delivery systems in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. J Nutr Biochem. 2022;109:109101. CrossRef
28. Zhang LX, Li CX, Kakar MU, Khan MS, Wu PF, Amir RM, et al. Resveratrol (RV): a pharmacological review and call for further research. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;143:112164. CrossRef
29. Meng T, Xiao D, Muhammed A, Deng J, Chen L, He J. Anti-inflammatory action and mechanisms of resveratrol. Molecules 2021;26:1–15. CrossRef
30. López Luengo MT. Flavonoids. Fitoterapia 2002;21:13028951.
31. Lima DR de, de Araújo Franca MG, de Cássia Evangelista de Oliveira F, do Ó Pessoa C, Cavalheiro AJ, de Vasconcelos Silvaa MG. Metabolic profiling and cytotoxic activity of methanol extracts from Chamaecrista duckeana (P. Bezerra & A. Fern.) H. S. Irwin & Barneby (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae). Quim Nova. 2022;45:803–6. CrossRef
32. Odhiambo RS, Kareru PG, Mwangi EK, Onyango DW. Antioxidant activity, total phenols, flavonoids and lcms profile of Chamaecrista hildebrandtii (Vatke) lock and Clerodendrum rotundifolium (Oliv.). European J Med Plants 2019;26:1–11. CrossRef
33. Trentin DDS, Giordani RB, Zimmer KR, Da Silva AG, Da Silva MV, Correia MTDS, et al. Potential of medicinal plants from the Brazilian semi-arid region (Caatinga) against Staphylococcus epidermidis planktonic and biofilm lifestyles. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;137:327–35. CrossRef
34. de Morais CB, Scopel M, Pedrazza GPR, da Silva FK, Dalla Lana DF, Tonello ML, et al. Anti-dermatophyte activity of Leguminosae plants from Southern Brazil with emphasis on Mimosa pigra (Leguminosae). J Mycol Med. 2017;27:530–8. CrossRef
35. Mateos-Martín ML, Fuguet E, Jiménez-Ardón A, Herrero-Uribe L, Tamayo-Castillo G, Torres JL. Identification of polyphenols from antiviral Chamaecrista nictitans extract using high-resolution LC-ESI-MS/MS. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406:5501–6. CrossRef
36. Imran M, Aslam Gondal T, Atif M, Shahbaz M, Batool Qaisarani T, Hanif Mughal M, et al. Apigenin as an anticancer agent. Phyther Res. 2020;34:1812–28. CrossRef
37. Hassan SS ul, Samanta S, Dash R, Karpinski TM, Habibi E, Sadiq A, et al. The neuroprotective effects of fisetin, a natural flavonoid in neurodegenerative diseases: focus on the role of oxidative stress. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1015835. CrossRef
38. Tian C, Liu X, Chang Y, Wang R, Lv T, Cui C, et al. Investigation of the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of luteolin, kaempferol, apigenin and quercetin. South African J Bot. 2021;137:257–64. CrossRef
39. Kempuraj D, Thangavel R, Kempuraj DD, Ahmed ME, Selvakumar GP, Raikwar SP, et al. Neuroprotective effects of flavone luteolin in neuroinflammation and neurotrauma. BioFactors 2021;47:190–7. CrossRef
40. Çetinkaya M, Baran Y. Therapeutic potential of luteolin on cancer. Vaccines 2023;11:554. CrossRef
41. Yang D, Wang T, Long M, Li P. Quercetin: its main pharmacological activity and potential application in clinical medicine. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:8825387.
42. Islam MS, Quispe C, Hossain R, Islam MT, Al-Harrasi A, Al-Rawahi A, et al. Neuropharmacological effects of quercetin: a literature-based review. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:1–16. CrossRef
43. Singh P, Arif Y, Bajguz A, Hayat S. The role of quercetin in plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;166:10–9. CrossRef
44. Shen M, Yuan L, Zhang J, Wang X, Zhang M, Li H, et al. Phytosterols: physiological functions and potential application. Foods 2024;13:1754. CrossRef
45. Salehi B, Quispe C, Sharifi-Rad J, Cruz-Martins N, Nigam M, Mishra AP, et al. Phytosterols: from preclinical evidence to potential clinical applications. Front Pharmacol. 2021;11:599959. CrossRef
46. Sebei K, Sbissi I, Souhir A, Herchi W, Ssakouhi F, Boukhchina S. Phylogenetic identification, phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activity of Chamaecrista absus var. absus seeds. J Plant Biol Res. 2014;3:1–11.
47. Babu S, Jayaraman S. An update on β-sitosterol: apotential herbal nutraceutical for diabetic management. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;131:110702. CrossRef
48. Uttu AJ, Sallau MS, Ibrahim H, Iyun ORA. Isolation, characterization, and docking studies of campesterol and β-sitosterol from Strychnos innocua (Delile) root bark. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2023;18:566–78. CrossRef
49. Kaur N, Chugh V, Gupta AK. Essential fatty acids as functional components of foods- a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2014;51:2289–303. CrossRef
50. Tangavelou AC, Viswanathan MB, Balakrishna K, Patra A. Phytochemical analysis in the leaves of Chamaecrista nigricans (Leguminosae). Pharm Anal Acta 2018;9:582. CrossRef
51. Saini RK, Prasad P, Sreedhar RV, Naidu KA, Shang X, Keum YS, et al. Omega−3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs): emerging plant and microbial sources, oxidative stability, bioavailability, and health benefits—a review’. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021;10(10):1627. doi:10.3390/antiox10101627
52. Rogero MM, Leão M de C, Santana TM, Pimentel MV d. MB, Carlini GCG, da Silveira TFF, et al. Potential benefits and risks of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation to patients with COVID-19. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;156:190–9. CrossRef
53. Alagawany M, Elnesr SS, Farag MR, El-Sabrout K, Alqaisi O, Dawood MAO, et al. Nutritional significance and health benefits of omega-3, -6 and -9 fatty acids in animals. Anim Biotechnol. 2022;33:1678–90. CrossRef
54. Morales J, Rodrigo Valenzuela B, Daniel González M, Marcela González E, Gladys Tapia O, Julio Sanhueza C, et al. New dietary sources of alpha-linolenic acid: a critical view. Rev Chil Nutr. 2012;39:79–87.
55. Malik E, Müller C. Anthraquinones as pharmacological tools and drugs. Med Res Rev. 2016;86:84–92. CrossRef
56. Diaz-Muñoz G, Miranda IL, Sartori SK, de Rezende DC, Diaz MAN. Anthraquinones: an overview. Stud Nat Prod Chem. 2018;58:313–38. CrossRef
57. Sharifi-Rad J, Herrera-Bravo J, Kamiloglu S, Petroni K, Mishra AP, Monserrat-Mesquida M, et al. Recent advances in the therapeutic potential of emodin for human health. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;154:113555. CrossRef
58. Mitra S, Anjum J, Muni M, Das R, Rauf A, Islam F, et al. Exploring the journey of emodin as a potential neuroprotective agent: novel therapeutic insights with molecular mechanism of action. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;149:112877. CrossRef
59. Silva FCO, Ferreira MKA, Da Silva AW, Matos MGC, Magalhães FEA, Da Silva PT, et al. Bioativities of plant-isolated triterpenes: a brief review. Rev Virtual Quim, 2020;12:234–47. CrossRef
60. Li Y, Liu X, Li L, Zhang T, Gao Y, Zeng K, et al. Characterization of the metabolism of eupalinolide A and B by carboxylesterase and cytochrome P450 in human liver microsomes. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1–12. CrossRef
61. Sieber MA, Hegel JKE. Azelaic acid: properties and mode of action. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2013;27:9–17. CrossRef
62. Sadegh M, Baharara H, Sahebkar A, Ahmad S. Pharmacological research - modern chinese medicine Cassia species: a review of traditional uses, phytochemistry. Pharmacol Res - Mod Chinese Med. 2023;9:100325.
63. Cholich LA, Pistán ME, Torres AM, Ortega HH, Gardner DR, Bustillo S. Characterization and cytotoxic activity on glial cells of alkaloid-enriched extracts from pods of the plants prosopis flexuosa and prosopis Nigra (Fabaceae). Rev Biol Trop. 2021;69:197–206. CrossRef
64. Kite GC. Leontidine-type quinolizidine alkaloids in Orphanodendron (Leguminosae). Biochem Syst Ecol. 2017;73:47–9. CrossRef
65. Dadgostar P. Antimicrobial resistance: implications and costs. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:3903–10. CrossRef
66. Gobi M, Sujatha M, Pradeepa V, Muralidharan M, Venkatesan M. Green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles (FeONPs) and its antibacterial effect using Chamaecrista nigricans (Vahl) Greene (Caesalpiniaceae). Biomass Convers Biorefinery 2023; 1–8. CrossRef
67. Pinho BR, Ferreres F, Valentão P, Andrade PB. Nature as a source of metabolites with cholinesterase-inhibitory activity: an approach to Alzheimer’s disease treatment. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;65:1681–700. CrossRef
68. Ramana KV, Reddy ABM, Ravi Kumar Majeti NV, Singhal SS. Therapeutic potential of natural antioxidants. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:9471051. CrossRef
69. Álvarez-Rodríguez A, Jin BK, Radwanska M, Magez S. Recent progress in diagnosis and treatment of Human African Trypanosomiasis has made the elimination of this disease a realistic target by 2030. Front Med. 2022;9:1–12. CrossRef
70. Stagos D. Antioxidant activity of polyphenolic plant extracts. Antioxidants. 2020;9:19. CrossRef
71. Wang TY, Li Q, Bi KS. Bioactive flavonoids in medicinal plants: structure, activity and biological fate. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2018;13:12–23. CrossRef
72. Reis JDE, Gomes PWP, Muribeca A de JB, Castro MNR de. Quantification of phenolic derivatives and antioxidant activity of the leaves of Chamaecrista diphylla (L.) Greene (Fabaceae)). Sci Plena 2020;16:1–9. CrossRef
73. David JP, Meira M, David JM, Brandão HN, Branco A, de Fátima Agra M, et al. Radical scavenging, antioxidant and cytotoxic activity of Brazilian Caatinga plants. Fitoterapia 2007;78:215–8. CrossRef
74. Musarra-pizzo M, Pennisi R, Ben-amor I, Mandalari G, Sciortino MT. Antiviral activity exerted by natural products against human viruses. Viruses 2021;13:1–30. CrossRef
75. Gonz P, Alvarenga N, Burgos-edwards A, Flores-giubi ME, Bar JE, Cristina M, et al. Screening of natural products inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 entry. Molecules 2022;27:1–10. CrossRef
76. Saboyá-Díaz MI, Maia-Elkhoury ANS, Luciañez A, Valadas SYOB, Carvaho-Scholte RG, Nicholls RS, et al. Neglected infectious diseases in the Americas: current situation and perspectives for the control and elimination by 2030. Front Trop Dis. 2024;5:1–7. CrossRef
77. Madaki F, Kabiru A, Mann A, Abdulkadir A, Agadi J, Akinyode A. Phytochemical analysis and in-vitro antitrypanosomal activity of selected medicinal plants in Niger State, Nigeria. Int J Biochem Res Rev. 2016;13:1–7. CrossRef
78. Zugazagoitia J, Guedes C, Ponce S, Ferrer I, Molina-Pinelo S, Paz-Ares L. Current challenges in cancer treatment. Clin Ther. 2016;38:1551–66. CrossRef
79. Huang M, Lu JJ, Ding J. Natural products in cancer therapy: past, present and future. Nat Products Bioprospect. 2021;11:5–13. CrossRef
80. Akhila JS, Shyamjith D, Alwar MC. Acute toxicity studies and determination of median lethal dose. Curr Sci. 2007;93:917–20.
81. Medugu AN, Yakubu J, Marte HI, Yerima TS. Anti-epileptic potentials of the partitioned fractions of Chamaecrista mimosoides. Int J Pharmacol Toxicol. 2020;8:89–95.
82. Conrado GG, da Rosa R, Reis RD, Pessa LR. Building natural product–based libraries for drug discovery: challenges and opportunities from a brazilian pharmaceutical industry perspective. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2024;34:706–21. CrossRef
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
The supplementary material can be accessed at the link here: [https://japsonline.com/admin/php/uploadss/4649_pdf.pdf]








