Information technology in pharmacy practice: Barriers and utilization

Anan S. Jarab Walid Al-Qerem Tareq L. Mukattash   

Open Access   

Published:  Sep 27, 2022

DOI: 10.7324/JAPS.2023.130114

A web-based cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate pharmacists’ perception of information technology (IT) utilization and to explore the barriers for its implementation in hospital and community pharmacies. Three scores were calculated including tasks, frequency of use, and capability scores. The majority of the participants (n = 784) were community pharmacists (88.8%) and had less than 10 years of work experience (94.8%). Google was the most frequently used source for information (72.4%). No vision or strategic plan for IT was the most common barrier for IT utilization (41.5%). Pharmacists who had a Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm. D) degree had a significantly higher mean in the three calculated scores, and females had a significantly higher tasks score mean. Quantile regression results showed that Pharm. D holders had significantly higher task scores (Coefficient = 1.09, p-value < 0.01) than those with Bachelor of Pharmacy (BPharm) degree, who had significantly lower frequency and capability scores (Coefficient = −6.68 and −1.80, p = 0.02 and <0.01, respectively). Efforts should be made by the different healthcare authorities to overcome the identified bariers and to improve pharmacists’ utilization of IT in order to improve patient care and health outcomes.

Keyword:     Information technology barriers utilization pharmacy Jordan


Anan S. Jarab, Walid Al-Qerem, Tareq L. Mukattash. Information technology in pharmacy practice: Barriers and utilization. J Appl Pharm Sci, 2022.

Copyright: © The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

HTML Full Text


Abu-Gharbieh E, Al Khalidi D, Baig MR, Khan SA. Refining knowledge, attitude and practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) among pharmacy students for professional challenges. Saudi Pharm J, 2015; 23(2):162-6.

Agrawal A, Wu WY. Reducing medication errors and improving systems reliability using an electronic medication reconciliation system. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2009; 35(2):106-14.

Al Bawab AQ, AlQahtani F, McElnay J. Health care apps reported in newspapers: content analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2018; 6(10):e10237.

Alwani AES, Soomro S. Barriers to effective use of information technology in science education at Yanbu Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In: Soomro S (ed.). E-learning experiences and future, IntechOpen, London, UK, pp 36-46, 2010.

Badescu M, Garcés-Ayerbe C. The impact of information technologies on firm productivity: Empirical evidence from Spain. Technovation, 2009; 29(2):122-9.

Bhuvan KC, Lim D, Low CC, Chew C, Blebil AQ, Dujaili JA, Alrasheedy AA. Positioning and utilization of information and communication technology in Community Pharmacies of Selangor, Malaysia: cross-sectional study. JMIR Med Inform, 2020; 8(7):e17982.

Buckeridge DL, Goel V. Medical informatics in an undergraduate curriculum: a qualitative study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2002; 2(1):6.

Chonsilapawit T, Rungpragayphan S. Skills and knowledge of informatics, and training needs of hospital pharmacists in Thailand: a self-assessment survey. Int J Med Inform, 2016; 94:255-62.

Eun-Ok I, Wonshik C. Recruitment of research participants through the Internet. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 2004; 22(5):289-97.

Fox BI, Flynn AJ, Fortier CR, Clauson KA. Knowledge, skills, and resources for pharmacy informatics education. Am J Pharm Educ, 2011; 75(5):93.

Hawkins B. ASHP Statement on the Pharmacist's Role in Clinical Informatics. Am J Heal Pharm, 2016; 73(6):410-3.

Holler J. 2013. The role of information technology in advancing pharmacy practice models to improve patient safety [ONLINE] Available via (Accessed 26 December 2021).

Kemp S. DIGITAL 2020: JORDAN-DataReportal-global digital insights [ONLINE]. Available via digital-2020-jordan (Accessed 09 April 2022).

Kish L. Survey sampling. John Wiley & Sons Publisher, New York, 1965.

Kostagiolas PA, Aggelopoulou VA, Niakas D. A study of the information seeking behaviour of hospital pharmacists: empirical evidence from Greece. Health Info Libr J, 2011; 28(4):302-12.

Kumar K. Integrated health information architecture to facilitate state-wide and national evidence-based public health monitoring: a case study based in India, AMIA, San Francisco, CA 2015.

Leader WG, Pestotnik SL, Chandler MH. Integrating pharmacokinetics into point-of-care information systems. Clin Pharmacokinet, 1996; 31(3):165-73.

Leung V, Tharmalingam S, Cooper J, Charlebois M. Canadian community pharmacists' use of digital health technologies in practice. Can Pharm J, 2016; 149(1):38-45.

Martin AE, Stumpf JL, Ryan ML. Assessing pharmacists' competence in clinical information retrieval. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 1996; 53(24):2957-8.

Néri EDR, Meira AS, Vasconcelos HB da S, Woods DJ, Fonteles MM de F. Knowledge, skills and attitudes of hospital pharmacists in the use of information technology and electronic tools to support clinical practice: a Brazilian survey. PLoS One, 2017; 12(12):e0189918.

Pestotnik SL. Expert clinical decision support systems to enhance antimicrobial stewardship programs: insights from the society of infectious diseases pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy, 2005; 25(8):1116-25.

Valdiserri RO, Forsyth AD, Yakovchenko V, Koh HK. Measuring what matters: development of standard HIV core indicators across the U.S. department of health and human services. Public Health Rep, 2013; 128(5):354-9.

Wang L, Wang J, Wang M, Li Y, Liang Y, Xu D. Using internet search engines to obtain medical information: a comparative study. J Med Internet Res, 2012; 14(3):1-19.

White CL, Hohmeier KC. Pharmacy informatics: current and future roles for the pharmacy technician. J Pharm Technol, 2015; 31(6):247-52.

Yap KY-L, Chan A, Chui WK. Improving pharmaceutical care in oncology by pharmacoinformatics: the evolving role of informatics and the internet for drug therapy. Lancet Oncol, 2009; 10(10):1011-9.

Article Metrics

0 Absract views 3 PDF Downloads 3 Total views

   Abstract      Pdf Download

Related Search

By author names

Citiaion Alert By Google Scholar

Name Required
Email Required Invalid Email Address

Comment required