Research Article | Volume: 16, Issue: 4, April, 2026

Anticancer activity and metabolomic profiling of culturable marine fungi from the South Coast of Jember, East Java, Indonesia

Endah Puspitasari Kartika Senjarini I. Dewa Ayu Ratna Dewanti Nunuk Aries Nurulita Jelita Putri Afdilla Nasution Ari Satia Nugraha Antje Labes   

Open Access   

Published:  Mar 05, 2026

DOI: 10.7324/JAPS.2026.281392
Abstract

Our previous study revealed 17 stably re-culturable marine fungi strains isolated from the South Coast of Jember, East Java, Indonesia. This research was conducted to determine the fungi’s cancer chemoprevention activity and the potential candidate’s metabolite profile. First, their secondary metabolites were extracted using ethyl acetate, and then the extracts were evaluated by their cytotoxicity and selectivity on several cancer cell lines (T47D breast cancer, HeLa cervical cancer, and WiDr colon cancer) and normal cell lines (Vero) using the (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. The selective cytotoxic marine fungi were then analyzed for cell cycle and apoptosis induction using flow cytometry and their metabolite profile using untargeted ultra-high performance liquid chromatography—high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS). Among the extracted fungi, the Aspergillus stromatoides strain SaH 1 demonstrated potential as a source of cancer chemopreventive compounds on T47D breast cancer cells based on cytotoxicity and selectivity assays, warranting further bioactivity-guided isolation and characterization studies. The cell cycle and apoptosis analysis demonstrated that it induced G0-G1 and G2/M cell cycle arrest and induced apoptosis, not necrosis, suggesting that this strain could be developed as a cancer chemoprevention agent. The metabolite profile of A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 using UHPLC-HRMS analysis revealed 606 molecular features, 76% without reported matches, indicating potential novel metabolites that require further structural confirmation. Among them, two compounds—flavoglaucin and 7β-hydroxy-DHEA—have been reported in Aspergillus sp. with documented anticancer properties; these metabolites may have contributed to, but do not solely account for, the anticancer activity observed in SaH 1. This study highlights A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 as a preliminary candidate for breast cancer chemoprevention, with further isolation and in vivo validation needed to confirm its potential.


Keyword:     Culturable marine fungi A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 flavoglaucin 7β-hydroxy- DHEA anticancer


Citation:

Puspitasari E, Senjarini K, Dewanti IDAR, Nurulita NA, Nasution JPA, Nugraha AS, Labes A. Anticancer activity and metabolomic profiling of culturable marine fungi from the south coast of Jember, East Java, Indonesia. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2026;16(04):357-368. http://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2026.281392

Copyright: © The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

HTML Full Text

1. INTRODUCTION

Marine and coastal fungi have emerged as promising sources of cancer chemopreventive agents due to their diverse bioactive metabolites [13]. These microorganisms inhabit unique ecosystems and have demonstrated cytotoxic, antiproliferative, antiangiogenic, and antitumor activities in previous studies [4]. Marine fungi from Indonesia, particularly those found along the South Coast of Jember, remain largely unexplored, despite their potential therapeutic value [5,6].

Our previous study revealed that only 17 out of 47 marine fungi isolated from the South Coast of Jember, Indonesia, are stably re-culturable [7]. In this study, we evaluated their cancer chemopreventive potential by assessing cytotoxicity, selectivity, effects on cell cycle progression, and apoptosis induction in T47D (breast cancer), HeLa (cervical cancer), and WiDr (colon cancer) cell lines, alongside Vero normal cells. Additionally, metabolite profiling of promising candidates was performed to support compound screening and mechanistic understanding.

Unlike previous studies that primarily investigated terrestrial Aspergillus strains or used targeted chemical analyses [8], or studies on marine-derived Aspergillus that did not integrate metabolomic profiling with functional anticancer assays [9], the present study focuses on Aspergillus stromatoides strain SaH 1. The primary contribution is the demonstration of its anticancer activity and comprehensive untargeted ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC–HRMS) metabolomic profiling. Secondary contributions include the identification of bioactive metabolites, flavoglaucin and 7β-hydroxy- dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and the establishment of a preliminary molecular landscape to facilitate further exploration of marine-derived fungi.


2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cancer cell lines (T47D breast cancer, HeLa cervical cancer, and WiDr colon cancer) and normal cell lines (Vero) are collected by the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada. RPMI 1640 (Gibco) was used for T47D, HeLa, and WiDr media culture, while M199 (Gibco) was used for Vero media culture. The culturable marine fungi isolated from the South Coast of Jember, East Java, Indonesia, were obtained from our previous study [7]. All other chemicals were purchased from local suppliers and were of analytical grade. To ensure reproducibility, the marine fungi were cultured in two independent batches. Metabolite profiles and subsequent bioactivity assays were consistent across both batches, confirming the reliability of the experimental results.

2.1. Extraction of bioactive compounds

Bioactive compounds were extracted based on the method described by Al-Saleem et al. [10] with a slight modification. The culturable fungi obtained from the previous study were cultured in broth media corresponding to the previous study. The strains SaH 1, WoH 6, and WoH 6.2 were cultured using Hastingsmedia; WoHS 3.1 and WoHS 3.2 were cultured using Hastings media supplemented with streptomycin, while WoP 2 and RaP 2 were cultured using potato dextrose broth [7]. At first, a loopful of fungal cultures was introduced into 6 ml of culture media and incubated in a shaker incubator at room temperature. After 7 days of incubation, the culture was transferred into 100 ml of culture media and incubated further for 13 days. The culture was done in duplicates. On day 14, the amount of biomass formed was considered sufficient. The culture (100 ml) was homogenized using an ultrasonicator at 40% amplitude for three 30-second pulses, with 30-second intervals on ice to prevent overheating. The extraction was done using an equivalent volume of ethyl acetate by liquid-liquid extraction and then transferred to a separating funnel. The ethyl acetate phase was collected, while the aqueous layer was extracted twice with an equivalent volume of ethyl acetate. The combined ethyl acetate phase was concentrated using a rotary evaporator [11,12]. The extract was recovered using methanol and transferred into a vial. The methanol was air dried, preparing the extract for further analysis [10]. The extract was then referred to as the ethyl acetate extract.

2.2. Modulation of cancer cells’ proliferation analysis

The analysis was done using the ethyl acetate extract. The ethyl-acetate extracts were resolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and then diluted using the culture media appropriate for each cell line. The concentration used for DMSO was maintained at less than 1% to minimize any potential cytotoxic effects. This concentration was selected based on previous cytotoxicity studies with T47D, HeLa, WiDr, and Vero cells, which showed that 1% DMSO does not induce significant cytotoxicity in vehicle-control cells [1315]. Doxorubicin was used as a positive control due to its broad-spectrum anticancer activity across multiple cancer cell lines, allowing appropriate benchmarking of cytotoxic effects, while 1% DMSO (vehicle control) served as the negative control. All assays were performed in triplicate as technical replicates for each treatment condition, following standard protocols for cytotoxicity, cell cycle, and apoptosis analyses. Owing to the limited quantity of fungal extracts and the large number of experimental conditions, biological replicates could not be performed, as extract yields were insufficient to generate multiple independent batches. The series of analyses comprised the following assays:

2.3. Cytotoxicity analysis using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay

The cytotoxicity testing was done on various cancer cell lines, i.e., T47D breast cancer cell line, HeLa cervical cancer cell line, WiDr colon cancer cell line. Each cell density of 104 in 100 µl of the suitable culture media was transferred into a 96-well microplate and incubated for 24 hours prior to treatment. A series of concentrations of the ethyl acetate extracts was added, and a further incubation for 24 hours was performed [13]. At the end of the incubation, MTT (0.5 mg/ml) was added to each well, and incubated for 4 hours until the formazan was formed. The stopper reagent containing 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate in HCl 0.1 N was added to dissolve the formazan crystal. Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reader, the microplate should be kept in the dark overnight before the absorbance measurement at λ 597 nm. The dehydrogenases in active mitochondria of living cells will break down the tetrazolium ring of MTT and form a formazan crystal [16]. The IC50 value of the extract was calculated from the concentration versus viable cells plot by fitting the data using multiple regression approaches, including linear regression, probit analysis, and nonlinear curve fitting; the model yielding the highest correlation coefficient was selected for IC50 determination [13]. Based on the IC50 value, an extract was considered as potentially cytotoxic with IC50 < 100 µg/ml, moderately cytotoxic with 100 µg/ml < IC50 < 1,000 µg/ml, and non-toxic with IC50 > 1,000 µg/ml [17].

2.4. Selectivity analysis based on the selectivity index

Selectivity analysis was done by comparing cytotoxicity test results against several cancer cell lines with normal cells. Vero cell lines were used as a standard cell comparator. Vero cells were selected as a general normal cell comparator to provide a baseline for assessing non-specific cytotoxicity across all cancer cell lines tested. We acknowledge that Vero cells are not tissue-specific for breast cancer; therefore, the calculated selectivity indices (SIs) reflect general cytotoxic selectivity rather than breast cancer-specific selectivity. Future studies using tissue-relevant normal mammary cells would provide a more precise assessment of breast cancer selectivity. A selectivity test was conducted using the MTT assay with the SI value as the parameter. An SI value < 1 was interpreted as unselective against cancer cells, indicating that the sample also affected normal cells [18], while the value of 1.00 < SI < 3 indicated that the test extract exhibited higher selectivity toward cancer cell cultures than toward normal cells [19], and an SI value > 3 was interpreted as selective against cancer cells, suggesting that the sample was unlikely to affect normal cells [18]. The selective cytotoxic fungi were considered for further development as cancer chemoprevention agents; they were then evaluated further for cell cycle and apoptosis analysis on the respective cancer cell lines.

2.5. Cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry

Cell cycle analysis was carried out using the flow cytometry-propidium iodide method. Cells (3 × 105 cells/ml) in the suitable culture medium were transferred into a 12-well microplate and incubated for 24 hours before treatment. Then, they were treated with ethyl acetate extracts of potent fungi based on the cytotoxicity and selectivity assay at a concentration around IC50. After 24 hours, cells were harvested and washed with phosphate buffer saline. The cells were stained with propidium iodide solution (100 µg/ml) containing RNase A (40 µg/ml) and Triton® X-100 (0.2%) (BD Cycle Test Plus DNA Reagent Kit) for 30 minutes. The cell suspension was filtered through a cell strainer cap and collected in a tube. The flow cytometer (BD FACSCanto II Flowcytometer, 8-color 3-laser) sorted the cells in citrate buffer and captured the targeted fluorescence signal given by propidium iodide. Propidium iodide intercalates into double-stranded DNA, resulting in a fluorescent signal. The signal corresponded to the DNA content of the cells. The cells were monitored for cell cycle profile using a flow cytometer and analyzed to compare the distribution of cells with the untreated group. The G1 phase was marked by 2n DNA content, and the S phase was determined by 2n-4n DNA content, while 4n DNA content represented G2/M phase of the cells [20].

2.6. Apoptosis analysis using flow cytometry

An apoptosis assay was performed using Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide staining [21] flow cytometry under selected extract treatment. Briefly, 3 × 105 cells/ml cell density of cancer cell line in the suitable culture media was transferred into a 12-well microplate and incubated for 24 hours before treatment. Then, they were treated with ethyl acetate extracts based on the cytotoxicity and selectivity assay at a concentration around IC50. After 24 hours of incubation, the cells were harvested. The harvested cells were stained with an Annexin-V staining kit (BD Pharmingen™ (fluorescein isothiocyanate) (FITC) Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I) composed of 100 ml binding buffer, 2 ml Annexin V, and 2 ml propidium iodide for 10 minutes at room temperature in a dark place. The cells were then measured using a flow cytometer to measure fluorescence intensity using FITC detection. The annexin V targeted the phosphatidylserine flip-flop during the early apoptosis, while propidium iodide colored the DNA when the cells underwent membrane disruption during apoptotic body formation or necrosis. Further analysis to calculate the apoptotic cells was done using the software from the flow cytometry instrument [22].

2.7. Metabolite profile analysis

The ethyl acetate extract of all selected fungi was analyzed for their compounds using UHPLC-HRMS. UHPLC–HRMS analyses were conducted with regular internal calibration to ensure consistent instrument performance. Metabolite peaks were identified and verified based on exact mass comparison against the built-in database. An ACQUITY UPLC® H-Class (quaternary) system was tandem-connected to a Xevo® G2-S QTof (Waters) via an electrospray interface. Instrument control and data acquisition were performed in MassLynx (v4.2). The reverse-phase separations were performed using a mobile phase consisting of a gradient of methanol, aqueous, and formic acid. The peaks and spectra were processed and tentatively identified by comparing the reported data’s retention time (Rt) and mass signals. The ethyl acetate extract was dissolved in methanol (100 mg/ml) and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter, followed by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm. Sample (3 ul) was injected into ACQUITY UPLC® BEH C18 (1.7 µm 2.1 × 100 mm, Waters, USA) with gradient development method starting from 5% to 90% solvent B within 16 minutes followed by an isocratic development for 4 minutes before return to 5% solvent B at 25 minutes (solvent A: MS-grade water containing 0.1% formic acid, solvent B: MS-grade methanol containing 0.1% formic acid). The flow rate used was 0.3 mL/min. Mass spectra was obtained with experiment details as follow: electrospray ionization (ESI), mode: positive, sheath gas: N2, 32 AU, auxiliary gas: N2, 8 AU, sweep gas: N2, 4 AU, spray voltage: 3.30 k, capillary temperature: 320°C, auxiliary gas heater temperature: 30°C, scan range: 66.7–1,000 m/z, resolution: 70,000 for full MS and 17,600 for dd-MS2. Molecular annotation was generated by comparing detected and calculated mass ions with a discrepancy of less than 5 ppm using the database from https://www.chemcalc.org/ and https://www.chemspider.com/ [10].

Additionally, rigorous filtering and quality control steps were applied to remove artefacts and ensure data reliability. Raw peaks with low signal-to-noise ratio (< 3), poor peak shapes, or Rts outside the gradient were excluded. Peaks detected in blanks or corresponding to solvent or column signals were discarded, and features appearing in blanks at >10% of the sample intensity were considered artefacts. Isotopic peaks, adducts (Na+, K+), and multiply charged ions were consolidated, retaining only monoisotopic protonated species (M+H). Features with mass deviations >5 ppm relative to ChemCalc and ChemSpider were removed. Only high-confidence, reproducible features were retained, removing sporadic or inconsistent signals. Following these steps, 606 molecular features were detected, of which 461 (76%) were unmatched in ChemSpider, suggesting a high potential for previously undescribed or poorly characterized metabolites.

2.8. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were designed to address a priori, biologically meaningful comparisons rather than exhaustive multiple pairwise testing. In the cytotoxicity assays, cell viability of marine fungal extract-treated cells was compared with 1% DMSO as the vehicle control (defined as 0% effect) and with doxorubicin as the positive control within each cell line, providing relevant benchmarks for evaluating cytotoxic activity. For cell cycle and apoptosis analyses, statistical testing was focused on comparisons with the biologically meaningful live cell control (1% DMSO, 0% effect), followed by evaluation of concentration-dependent effects of the SaH 1 extract, and direct comparison with doxorubicin as the positive control (defined as 100% effect).

Cell viability data were analyzed separately for each cell line. Data from T47D, WiDr, and Vero cells met the assumptions of normality and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test. In contrast, HeLa cell viability data did not meet normality assumptions and were therefore analyzed using non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis tests, followed by Mann–Whitney post hoc comparisons. For cell cycle analysis, data for the sub-G1 and G2/M phases met assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by (least significant difference, post hoc statistical analysis) post hoc tests, whereas data for the G1 phase, S phase, and polyploidy were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis tests followed by Mann–Whitney post hoc comparisons. Apoptosis parameters (live cells, early apoptosis, late apoptosis, and necrosis) did not satisfy normality assumptions and were therefore analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis tests, followed by Mann–Whitney post hoc tests.

In addition to hypothesis testing, effect sizes were calculated to quantify the magnitude of pairwise differences. For pairwise comparisons following parametric analyses, Cohen’s d was calculated, whereas for non-parametric pairwise comparisons following the Kruskal–Wallis test, effect size r (Z/√N) was calculated. Reporting effect sizes was intended to complement p-value-based inference and to provide an estimate of biological relevance independent of statistical significance. All analyses were conducted at a 95% confidence level (p < 0.05).

The p-value was used to assess statistical significance: results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant (reject H0), whereas results with p ≥ 0.05 were considered not statistically significant (fail to reject H0). Effect sizes were calculated to evaluate the magnitude of differences between treatments. For T47D, WiDr, and Vero cells, Cohen’s d was used and interpreted as follows: <2 = very small/negligible, ≈ 0.2 = small, ≈ 0.5 = medium, ≈ 0.8 = large, and ≥ 1.2 = very large. For HeLa cells, the r statistic was used and interpreted as: <0.1 = very small/negligible, ≈ 0.1 = small, ~≈.3 = medium, and ≥ 0.5 = large effect (Supplementary Data 1). This approach allows both the statistical significance and the practical magnitude of the treatment effects to be evaluated. Because the statistical comparisons were hypothesis-driven and limited to predefined biological references, correction methods designed for extensive multiple testing, such as the Holm–Bonferroni procedure, were not applied.


3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Extraction of bioactive compounds

Among 17 stably re-culturable marine fungi strains taken from the South Coast of Jember, East Java, Indonesia, only 7 strains generated sufficient extract quantities for further studies. This was mainly due to strain-specific differences in growth and metabolite production. Despite medium optimization, some isolates produced limited biomass or low levels of extractable metabolites under in vitro conditions, which are common challenges in culturing marine-derived fungi. The culturable marine fungi that yielded a sufficient amount of ethyl acetate extract are listed in Table 1. These extracts were subsequently tested for their anticancer potential.

Table 1. Culturable marine fungi isolated and identified from the South Coast of Jember, Indonesia.

NoStrainIdentity
1SaH 1Aspergillus stromatoides EKAP-SaH 1a
2WoH 6Penicillium copticola EKAP-WoH 6a
3WoH 6.2Penicillium copticola EKAP-WoH 6.2a
4WoHS 3.1Curvularia lunata EKAP-WoHS 3.1a
5WoHS 3.2Curvularia lunata EKAP-WoHS 3.2a
6WoP 2Aspergillus sydowii EKAP-WoP 2b
7RaP 2Aspergillus versicolor EKAP-RaP 2a

Note: aPuspitasari et al. [7]

bthis study, NCBI Accession Number PV682694.1.

3.2. Modulation of cancer cells’ proliferation analysis

The ethyl acetate extract of culturable marine fungi isolated from the South Coast of Jember demonstrated differential cytotoxic effects across cancer and normal cell lines. At a concentration of 500 µg/ml, the extracts caused variable reductions in cell viability depending on the cell line (Fig. 1). As expected, 1% DMSO, used as the solvent control, did not affect viability in any cell line, while doxorubicin consistently produced the lowest viability, serving as a robust positive control. Among all extracts tested, A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 exhibited the strongest and most consistent cytotoxic activity, showing the lowest cell viability across all cancer cell lines.

Figure 1. Cell viability of T47D, HeLa, WiDr, and Vero cells treated with 500 µg/ml ethyl acetate extracts of culturable marine fungi. Data are shown as mean ± SE (n = 3). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences within each cell line (p < 0.05). Effect sizes are indicated separately for each cell line: T47D, WiDr, and Vero – Cohen’s d (? very large and large, ? medium, ? small); HeLa – r (? large, ? medium, ? small) based on the respective analysis.

[Click here to view]

In T47D breast cancer cells, most marine fungal extracts markedly reduced viability, with SaH 1 showing particularly strong activity approaching that of doxorubicin. Several other extracts exhibited moderate-to-large reductions in viability, indicating broadly similar biological activity. In HeLa cervical cancer cells, multiple extracts—including SaH 1, WoH 6, WoH 6.2, WoHS 3.1, and WoHS 3.2—also induced meaningful cytotoxicity relative to DMSO, with large effect sizes indicating strong biological impact. Notably, WoH 6.2 displayed greater cytotoxicity than WoH 6, suggesting that minor differences in metabolite composition may lead to significant activity changes. Conversely, WoP 2 and RaP 2 were less effective, consistent with their smaller effect sizes.

For WiDr colorectal cancer cells, cytotoxic responses were more selective. SaH 1, WoHS 3.2, WoP 2, and RaP 2 significantly reduced viability, whereas WoH 6 and WoH 6.2 were comparatively less active. In Vero normal cells, SaH 1 and several other extracts reduced viability with large effect sizes, whereas most extracts showed limited toxicity. Doxorubicin again induced the strongest cytotoxicity, emphasizing the sensitivity of normal cells to chemotherapeutic stress and highlighting the importance of evaluating therapeutic selectivity.

The IC50 of ethyl acetate extract was then calculated to evaluate the cytotoxic activity (Table 2), followed by the (SI, Table 3). DMSO was used as a negative control (0% of effect), while doxorubicin was used as a positive control (100% of effect). DMSO showed no toxicity, with IC50 values exceeding 1,000 μg/ml in all cells (Table 2). Doxorubicin demonstrated cell line-dependent cytotoxicity, with IC50 values of 0.30 ± 0.05 μg/ml (T47D), 0.02 ± 0.04 μg/ml (HeLa), 0.91 ± 0.31 μg/ml (WiDr), and 15.23 ± 8.16 μg/ml (Vero) (Table 2). IC50 values varied across cell lines, consistent with prior studies, categorized as potentially cytotoxic on cancer cell lines and moderate cytotoxic on normal cell lines [23,24].

Table 2. IC50 values of ethyl acetate extracts of culturable marine fungi isolated from the South Coast of Jember, Indonesia.

NoStrainIC50 (µg/ml)*
T47DHeLaWiDrVero
1SaH 1298 ± 36?6,318 ± 2,741c?528 ± 130b?1,509 ± 294c?
2WoH 6800 ± 16b?610 ± 49b?11,265 ± 6,882c?2,692 ± 1,025c?
3WoH 6.21,169 ± 11c?725 ± 56b?6,522 ± 2,142c?11,046,298,592 ± 3,104,282,939c?
4WoHS 3.1128,089,866 ± 121,463c?13,654 ± 3,402c?1,585 ± 284c?904,041,451 ± 904,038,831c?
5WoHS 3.23,791,859,493 ± 3,791,858,427c?771 ± 60b?3,673 ± 2,215c?587 ± 245b?
6WoP 211,997 ± 7,787c?1,342 ± 516c?7,779 ± 7,121c?15,514 ± 6,266c?
7RaP 222,461 ± 20,707c?11,662,949,637 ± 11,662,948,880c?752 ± 440b?1,450 ± 963c?
8DMSO**14,613 ± 11,730c?87,068,639,678 ± 40,528,139,628c?1,831 ± 325c?3,287 ± 1,014c?
9doxorubicin**0.30 ± 0.05a?0.20 ± 0.04a?0.91 ± 0.31a?15.23 ± 8.16a?

*Data was shown as mean ± SE (n = 3).

**DMSO was used as a negative control, and doxorubicin was used as a positive control.

Cytotoxicity classification:

apotential cytotoxic: IC50 < 100 μg/ml

bmoderate cytotoxic: 100 μg/ml < IC50 < 1,000 μg/ml

non-toxic: IC50 > 1,000 μg/ml [24]

Regression method used for IC50 calculation:

?probit regression

?curved-fit regression

……. Lowest IC50 values indicate the highest cytotoxic activity among the marine fungal extracts.

Table 3. SI of ethyl acetate extracts of culturable marine fungi isolated from the South Coast of Jember, Indonesia.

NoStrainSI*
T47DHeLaWiDr
1SaH 15.1?0.2?2.9?
2WoH 63.4?4.4?0.2?
3WoH 6.2>1,000?>1,000?>1,000?
4WoHS 3.17.1?>1,000?>1,000?
5WoHS 3.20.0?0.8?0.2?
6WoP 21.3?11.6?2.0?
7RaP 20.1?0.0?1.9?

*SI classification:

?SI < 1 → Unselective against cancer cells (affects normal cells) [25].

?1 ≤ SI ≤ 3 → Moderate selectivity toward cancer cells [26].

?SI > 3 → Selective against cancer cells (unlikely to affect normal cells) [25].

None of the marine fungal extracts exhibited IC50 values below 100 μg/ml (Table 2), indicating limited potential cytotoxicity across all cell lines [17]. Some of the marine fungal extracts exhibited moderate cytotoxicity with 100 µg/ml < IC50 < 1,000 µg/ml on several cancer cell lines [17], i.e., A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 and Penicillium copticola strain WoH 6 on T47D; P. copticola strain WoH 6, P. copticola strain WoH 6.2, and Curvularia lunata strain WoHS 3.2 on HeLa; A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 and A. versicolor strain RaP 2 on WiDr; and also, C. lunata strain WoHS 3.2 on Vero. The others were revealed to be non-toxic with IC50 > 1,000 µg/ml [17].

Curvularia lunata strain WoHS 3.1 and Aspergillus sydowii strain WoP 2 demonstrated non-toxic activity against all cell lines in this study (Table 2). Previous studies showed that C. lunata ethyl acetate crude extract had moderate cytotoxicity against leukemia cell lines (100 µg/ml < IC50 < 1,000 µg/ml) [25], while isolated curvulomycins from C. lunata demonstrated potent cytotoxic activity on prostate cancer cells (IC50 < 20 µg/ml) [26]. Other studies revealed that A. sydowii exhibited strong cytotoxic activity against several cancer cell lines (IC50 < 100 µg/ml) [27]. These discrepancies may be due to variations in fungal strain origin and culture conditions, which can produce distinct metabolite profiles [28,29]. Of course, they could be useful for bioactivity-guided isolation [30,31], but they may not be active enough at low concentrations.

The lowest IC50 value of all marine fungi was obtained from SaH 1 on T47D breast cancer cell lines, indicating its highest cytotoxic activity and aligning with Figure 1. While the IC50 values of the crude extract indeed fall within the range of moderate cytotoxicity (100 µg/ml < IC50 < 1,000 µg/ml), this is expected due to complex metabolite mixtures, limited bioavailability, and reduced cellular uptake. Importantly, such moderate activity does not preclude biological relevance, as bioactivity-guided fractionation of extracts with comparable or even weaker initial IC50 values has frequently led to the isolation of highly potent anticancer compounds with IC50 values below 20 µg/ml [30,31]. Thus, despite moderate crude cytotoxicity, SaH 1 shows meaningful anticancer potential.

The ethyl acetate extract of marine fungi showed varying selectivity (Table 3). Some extracts were unselective, some were more selective, but most were selective. Being the most cytotoxic on T47D breast cancer cell lines, A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 showed selective activity against breast cancer cells compared to normal cells, with an SI value of 5.1 (Table 3). As noted in Methods, Vero cells serve as a general baseline for cytotoxicity. Although Vero cells provide a baseline for general cytotoxicity, they are not tissue-relevant for breast cancer; therefore, the calculated SIs reflect general cytotoxic selectivity rather than breast cancer-specific selectivity.

Based on the cytotoxicity and selectivity assays, A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 on T47D cells showed the highest cytotoxic activity with high selectivity (SI > 3, Table 3). To evaluate whether the cytotoxicity of the A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 ethyl acetate extract on the T47D breast cancer cell line was associated with its ability to induce cell cycle arrest or apoptosis, further analyses were conducted on its effects on the cell cycle, apoptosis induction, as well as its metabolite profile. The graphical representation of the cell cycle result was illustrated in Figure 2, while the results of apoptosis induction analysis were presented in Figure 3.

Figure 2. Cell cycle distribution of T47D breast cancer cells treated with SaH 1 ethyl acetate extract. Data are shown as mean ± SE (n = 3). Different letters within the same phase indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05), while ? indicates a large effect size (r ≥ 0.50).

[Click here to view]
Figure 3. Apoptosis induction in T47D breast cancer cells treated with SaH 1 ethyl acetate extract. Data are shown as mean ± SE (n = 3). Different letters within the same phase indicate statistically significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05), ? indicates a large effect size (r ≥ 0.50), and ? indicates a medium effect size (r ≈ 0.30).

[Click here to view]

Baseline analysis of untreated T47D control cells showed that the majority of cells were in the G0/G1 phase (44.37%), followed by G2/M (34.03%) and S phase (20.60%), with minimal sub-G1 (0.50%) and polyploid (0.53%) populations. This profile reflects actively proliferating cells with low spontaneous death. Treatment with SaH?1 induced substantial redistribution across cell cycle phases (Fig. 2). The sub-G1 population increased significantly, consistent with DNA fragmentation typically associated with apoptotic cells. Changes in the relative proportions of G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases indicate widespread disruption of cell cycle progression rather than arrest at a single checkpoint.

The increase in polyploid cells at higher SaH?1 concentrations suggests mitotic stress or failed cytokinesis, phenomena often linked to mitotic catastrophe—a form of cell death triggered by severe DNA damage and checkpoint failure. Mitotic catastrophe involves activation of DNA damage response (DDR) pathways (e.g., ATM/p53) leading to apoptosis rather than successful cell division, which has been demonstrated in other cancer models following severe genotoxic insult [32].

Flow cytometric analysis revealed the proportions of apoptotic and necrotic T47D cells following treatment with the fungal extract. While morphological assessment through microscopy was not performed, flow cytometry provided a quantitative, phase-specific evaluation of cell death, allowing precise comparison across treatments. These results align with the observed trends in overall cell viability, supporting the cytotoxic effect of the extract. Baseline apoptosis profiling of untreated T47D control cells revealed live cells (26.5%), early apoptotic (15.3%), late apoptotic (37.9%), and necrotic cells (11.5%) under standard culture conditions. SaH 1 treatment markedly reduced the proportion of live cells while significantly increasing both early and late apoptotic populations (Fig. 3). Although necrotic cells were elevated relative to control, the predominant mode of death was apoptosis, indicating a programmed cell death response rather than uncontrolled necrosis. This favorable shift—enhanced apoptosis with minimized necrosis—reflects a potentially safer anticancer mechanism, as apoptosis prevents the release of pro-inflammatory mediators and suppresses carcinogenesis [33], whereas necrosis is associated with inflammation that may promote tumor progression and aggressiveness [34,35]. Consequently, limiting necrotic cell death is critical for effective anticancer therapies [36].

The observed increase in sub-G1 and polyploid fractions, along with robust apoptosis induction by SaH?1, suggests that the extract triggers DNA damage-associated checkpoint disruption and engages intrinsic apoptotic pathways, possibly involving p53 activation. These mechanistic profiles align with those reported for genotoxic anticancer agents, supporting the biologically meaningful effects of SaH?1.

Doxorubicin, the positive control, induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via DNA intercalation and inhibition of topoisomerase?II, leading to double-strand breaks and activation of DDR kinases (ATM/ATR), phosphorylation of checkpoint kinases (CHK1/CHK2), and subsequent p53-mediated cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [37]. Doxorubicin also promotes reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, further contributing to DNA and mitochondrial damage and enhancing apoptotic signaling [38].

In summary, the ethyl acetate extract from marine fungi—particularly SaH?1—demonstrated meaningful anticancer potential through selective cytotoxicity, disturbance of cell cycle progression (Fig. 2), and apoptosis induction (Fig. 3) in T47D cells. These coordinated effects justify future bioactivity-guided isolation of active constituents and molecular characterization.

Consistent with our observations, marine-derived fungal metabolites have demonstrated a potential in modulating the cell cycle and DDR pathways in cancer cells, highlighting their broader therapeutic promise. For example, preussin, isolated from Aspergillus candidus KUFA 0062, inhibited the proliferation of breast cancer cells and induced cell cycle arrest at approximately 25 µM. Similarly, asperphenin A from a marine Aspergillus sp. triggered G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in colon cancer cells via ROS generation. The diketopiperazines waikikiamides A and C also exhibited potent antiproliferative activity, with IC50 values ranging from 0.5 to 1.8 µM [39]. Beyond these specific compounds, marine fungi have been shown to produce over 600 cytotoxic metabolites between 1991 and 2023, particularly from the genera Aspergillus and Penicillium, illustrating their remarkable chemical diversity and bioactivity potential [40]. Collectively, these findings underscore the value of marine fungi as a rich source of structurally diverse compounds capable of interfering with critical regulatory pathways in cancer cell proliferation and survival.

3.3. Metabolite profile analysis

The metabolite profiling was done using UHPLC-HRMS. The data suggest that the compound exhibits high ionization efficiency, indicating favorable ionization characteristics under the applied ESI conditions—likely due to its polarity or proton-donating functional groups [41,42].

The A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 metabolite profile was depicted in Figure 4. The detailed list of compounds contained in the ethyl acetate of A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 ethyl acetate extract was summarized in Supplementary Data 2. UHPLC-HRMS analysis enabled the detection of 606 molecular features, of which 461 (76%) molecular formulas were either not listed in ChemSpider or had no reported compounds associated with those formulas. This high proportion of unmatched formulas indicates that our samples may contain previously undescribed or less-characterized metabolites. However, as these annotations are based solely on accurate mass and database searches, they should be regarded as tentative identifications rather than definitive compound characterizations. Consequently, it is not possible to assign these unannotated features to specific compound classes, such as polyketides or alkaloids. The possibility that some of these metabolites represent novel natural products cannot be excluded, but further structural elucidation—including isolation, tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS)fragmentation analysis, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy—is essential to confirm their novelty and fully determine their chemical structures.

Figure 4. UHPLC–HRMS metabolite profile of SaH 1 ethyl acetate extract (top) and blank methanol solvent (bottom). Peaks corresponding to compounds of interest (flavoglaucin and 7β-hydroxy-DHEA) are highlighted with arrows (→).

[Click here to view]

Amid the various compounds identified in the A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 ethyl acetate extract, several have been previously reported in other strains of Aspergillus sp., i.e., flavoglaucin [43] and 7β-hydroxy-DHEA [44]. Notably, flavoglaucin has also been isolated from a terrestrial endolichenic Aspergillus sp. obtained from the lichen Xanthoparmelia conspersa, confirming that this metabolite is produced by non-marine strains as well [45]. However, there is currently no evidence that terrestrial Aspergillus sp. produce 7β-hydroxy-DHEA, and to our knowledge, no studies have directly compared the anticancer activities of marine- versus terrestrial-derived Aspergillus metabolites. These compounds were detected at a Rt of 14.466 minutes, corresponding to the molecular formula C19H28(NO)O3. Both compounds are known to exhibit anticancer activity [45,46]. The annotation of these two highlighted compounds was based on database comparisons of exact mass and Rt and is therefore considered putative (Level 2 confidence according to the Metabolomics Standards Initiative). No MS/MS spectral matching or in silico fragmentation analysis was performed in this study, but MS/MS confirmation and/or spiking with authentic standards will be conducted in follow-up work to provide higher annotation confidence. The UHPLC–HRMS analysis employed an untargeted approach to comprehensively profile all metabolites present in SaH 1, reflecting the exploratory nature of this work rather than quantifying specific compounds.

Flavoglaucin is a yellow p-terphenyl benzaldehyde derivative (C19H28O3) first isolated from A. glaucus in 1949 [43]. As a phenolic compound produced by Aspergillus sp., flavoglaucin demonstrates anticancer properties, primarily through antiproliferative mechanisms and the induction of apoptosis. In vitro studies using the human colorectal cancer cell line HT-29 showed that flavoglaucin significantly inhibited cell proliferation, with IC50 values of 9.17 µM at 24 hours and 34.40 µM at 48 hours. Notably, its potency at 24 hours surpassed that of two commonly used chemotherapeutic agents: 5-fluorouracil (IC50 > 50 µM) and irinotecan (IC50 = 28.00 µM). In addition to growth inhibition, flavoglaucin induced apoptosis, as evidenced by DNA fragmentation in cancer cells. Apoptosis, a form of programmed cell death, plays a crucial role in cancer therapy by selectively eliminating abnormal cells. The biological activity of flavoglaucin is closely associated with its chemical structure, particularly the presence of phenolic groups and a prenyl side chain. The position and saturation level of the prenyl chain at the C-3 position of the flavoglaucin molecule have been reported to influence its cytotoxic effects significantly. These findings suggest that flavoglaucin holds potential as an antiproliferative agent and a chemopreventive compound with possibly fewer side effects than conventional therapies [45].

In silico data demonstrated that flavoglaucin has moderate binding affinity toward cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK-2) and matrix metalloproteinase-13, suggesting a potential but limited contribution to anticancer activity through modulation of these pathways [47]. Furthermore, flavoglaucin exhibited moderate acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition, supported by docking analysis showing hydrogen-bond formation and π–π interactions within the AChE active site [48]. For cancers that exhibit elevated AChE activity—e.g., leukemia, retinoblastoma, brain, non-small cell lung, breast, and ovarian tumors—AChE inhibition may contribute to cytotoxicity by promoting caspase-dependent apoptosis, modulating the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway as a downstream component of p53, and influencing specific isoforms, particularly the synaptic variant (AChE-S), which is known to regulate and enhance apoptotic cell death [49]. Taken together, these findings indicate that while flavoglaucin may contribute modestly to growth inhibition through partial interference with cell cycle regulators such as CDK-2, its anticancer potential is more strongly associated with apoptosis induction mediated by AChE inhibition.

7β-hydroxy-DHEA is a hydroxylated metabolite of DHEA, produced via hydroxylation at the C-7 position by enzymatic action in A. niger KCH910. This reaction results in two epimers: 7α-hydroxy-DHEA and 7β-hydroxy-DHEA. These metabolites are formed via a minor biosynthetic pathway, likely involving cytochrome P450 enzymes or similar monooxygenases [44].

7β-Hydroxy-DHEA is also an endogenous androgenic metabolite of DHEA, with reported anticancer activity. Its mechanism of action involves inhibition of estrogen-mediated growth signaling in breast cancer cells. While breast cancer cells typically proliferate in response to estrogen via estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and beta (ERβ), 7β-hydroxy-DHEA does not act through the ERα pathway (as is the case with tamoxifen). Instead, it exerts its effects through ERβ and the membrane-associated estrogen receptor GPR30, which are implicated in estrogen response pathways. By interfering with estrogen signaling, 7β-hydroxy-DHEA disrupts the proliferative stimulus, leading to cell cycle arrest (at G0/G1 phase) and induction of apoptosis in breast cancer cells [46].

Our findings indicate that the anticancer properties of A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 ethyl acetate extract might be contributed by flavoglaucin and 7β-hydroxy-DHEA. The lower potency of A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 ethyl acetate extract likely reflected both its relatively low abundance of flavoglaucin and the highly complex mixture in which it resides; our UHPLC-HRMS profiling revealed 606 molecular features, 461 (76%) of which are uncharacterized and may impact bioactivity. It is plausible that some of these co-occurring metabolites could antagonize [50,51] flavoglaucin’s anticancer effects. While specific antagonistic interactions among marine fungal metabolites have not been well-documented, the substantial metabolic diversity in crude extracts (e.g., 86 compounds identified in a mangrove fungal study, 11 with potent cytotoxicity [52]), and reports of culture-condition-dependent shifts in metabolite activity via one strain many compounds approaches [53], support this hypothesis.

The metabolite profile and anticancer activity observed for the marine-derived A. stromatoides strain SaH 1 also highlight several novel aspects of this study. To the best of our knowledge, no UHPLC–HRMS (or comparable high-resolution LC–MS) analysis of ethyl acetate extracts of A. stromatoides has been reported previously, and chemical studies on this species remain virtually absent [54]. Unlike the predominantly terrestrial or airborne A. stromatoides strains described in earlier studies, this marine-derived strain originates from an ecological niche that can induce distinct and sometimes unique metabolite profiles due to factors such as salinity, pressure, and nutrient-related stressors [55]. Furthermore, the combination of untargeted UHPLC–HRMS metabolomic profiling with anticancer screening provides a broad-spectrum chemical and biological assessment, contrasting with prior work that typically focused on the isolation of only one or two compounds. Although Aspergillus is among the most extensively studied fungal genera, chemical diversity is highly species- and habitat-dependent, and many species—including A. stromatoides—remain largely unexplored in metabolite databases [56]. Collectively, these points emphasize the novelty of our study, which provides the first UHPLC–HRMS-based metabolomic characterization and anticancer assessment of a marine-derived A. stromatoides strain, filling a clear gap in the literature and expanding our understanding of this neglected species.

Although the screening of marine fungi for anticancer activity has been extensively reported, and this study does not involve the isolation or characterization of a new bioactive compound, it holds significance in a different way. By establishing a molecular landscape of culturable marine fungi from the South Coast of Jember, Indonesia, this work provides a foundation for future chemoprevention research, including targeted compound isolation, purification, and mechanistic studies. However, this study provides novelty by:

(1) detecting 606 molecular features via UHPLC-HRMS, of which 461 (76%) molecular formulas were not listed in ChemSpider or had no reported compounds, indicating potential for novel metabolites pending further structural elucidation using MS/MS and NMR techniques;

(2) isolating the fungal strain from the underexplored South Coastal Area of Jember, Indonesia, where ecological variation may contribute to unique bioactivity profiles even within the same species.

Accordingly, future studies will focus on bioactivity-guided fractionation and purification of active constituents, followed by comprehensive structural characterization to confirm compound identities and assess the presence of truly novel metabolites. In parallel, expanded mechanistic investigations and in vivo validation will be required to substantiate the anticancer potential observed in vitro and evaluate translational relevance. Overall, these findings highlight the chemical diversity of marine fungi from this region and establish a foundation for future compound discovery. Despite the large number of reported anticancer compounds, the demand for new anticancer agents remains high, underscoring the importance of continued screening efforts, particularly from underexplored sources, to identify novel anticancer candidates.


4. CONCLUSION

Based on the results, we can conclude that A. stromatoides strain SaH 1, a marine fungal isolate from the South Coast of Jember, exhibited selective cytotoxicity against cancer cells while sparing normal cells. It induced cell cycle arrest at the G0–G1 and G2/M phases and promoted apoptosis without triggering necrosis. Metabolite profiling identified flavoglaucin and 7β-hydroxy-DHEA, known anticancer compounds, and revealed that 76% of metabolites were uncharacterized, suggesting the presence of potentially novel compounds. Future studies will focus on bioactivity-guided fractionation, isolation of active constituents, and structural elucidation using MS/MS and NMR, as well as mechanistic studies, selectivity profiling, and in vivo validation to confirm anticancer effects and assess translational potential. Overall, these findings provide preliminary in vitro evidence that A. stromatoides SaH 1 is a promising source of anticancer metabolites, warranting further investigation.


5. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; took part in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreed to submit to the current journal; gave final approval of the version to be published; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All the authors are eligible to be author as per the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requirements/guidelines.


6. FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This study was funded by the Directorate General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia, through the Fundamental Research Grant 2023 with contract number 5439/UN25.3.1/LT/2023.


7. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors report no financial or any other conflicts of interest in this work.


8. ETHICAL APPROVALS

The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Medical Research, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Jember (Approval No.: 2524/UN25.8/KEPK/DL/2024; Date: 22 April 2024).


9. DATA AVAILABILITY

All data is available to the authors (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Fg5zQfK-MRRP5UqMxIYd6eekgix9DIp1?usp=sharing) and shall be provided upon request.


10. PUBLISHER’S NOTE

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. This journal remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.


11. USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGY

The authors declare that they have not used AI tools for writing and editing the manuscript, and no images were manipulated using AI.


REFERENCES

1. Bandaru N, Patil YP, Ekghara SD, Patil KS, Bonthu MG. Exploring marine-derived compounds as potential anti-cancer agents: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Cancer Pathog Ther. 2025;3: CrossRef

2. Zhang J, Zeng R, Labes A. Editorial: marine microbial-derived molecules and their potential medical and cosmetic applications. Front Microbiol. 2021;12: CrossRef

3. Zhang J, Wang J, Labes A, Zeng R. Editorial: marine microbial-derived molecules and their potential medical and cosmetic applications, volume II. Front Microbiol. 2023;14: CrossRef

4. Gomes N, Lefranc F, Kijjoa A, Kiss R. Can some marine-derived fungal metabolites become actual anticancer agents?. Mar Drugs. 2015;13(6):3950–91. CrossRef

5. Fitriyah D, Arimurti S, Senjarini K. Physiological and molecular characteristics of bacterial isolates from Bandealit Coastal area Jember, East Java, Indonesia. HAYATI J Biosci. 2013;20(2):89–93. CrossRef

6. Nugraha AS, Firli LN, Rani DM, Hidayatiningsih A, Lestari ND, Wongso H, et al. Indonesian marine and its medicinal contribution. Nat Prod Bioprospect. 2023;13(1):38. CrossRef

7. Puspitasari E, Senjarini K, Dewanti IDAR, Febrianti V, Hasanah FM, Labes A. Culturable marine fungal biodiversity from the South Coast of Jember, East Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas. 2025;26(6):3000–10. CrossRef

8. Fayek M, Ebrahim HY, Abdel-Aziz MS, Taha H, Moharram FA. Bioactive metabolites identified from Aspergillus terreus derived from soil. AMB Express. 2023;13(1):107. CrossRef

9. Wong Chin JM, Jeewon R, Fahad Alrefaei A, Puchooa D, Bahorun T, Neergheen VS. Marine-derived fungi from the genus Aspergillus (Ascomycota) and their anticancer properties. Mycology. 2025;16(2):545–92. CrossRef

10. Al-Saleem MSM, Hassan WHB, El Sayed ZI, Abdel-Aal MM, Abdel-Mageed WM, Abdelsalam E, et al. Metabolic profiling and in vitro assessment of the biological activities of the ethyl acetate extract of Penicillium chrysogenum “Endozoic of Cliona sp. Marine Sponge” from the Red Sea (Egypt). Mar Drugs. 2022;20(5):326. CrossRef

11. Kebede B, Wrigley S, Prashar A, Rahlff J, Wolf M, Reinshagen J, et al. Establishing the secondary metabolite profile of the marine fungus: Tolypocladium geodes sp. MF458 and subsequent optimisation of bioactive secondary metabolite production. Mar Drugs. 2017;15(4):84. CrossRef

12. Petersen LE, Marner M, Labes A, Tasdemir D. Rapid metabolome and bioactivity profiling of fungi associated with the leaf and rhizosphere of the baltic seagrass Zostera marina. Mar Drugs. 2019;17(7):419. CrossRef

13. Puspitasari E, Nuri N, Ningsih IY, Triatmoko B, Dianasari D. Antiproliferative activity of ethanolic extract of Kembang Bulan (Tithonia diversifolia) leaf on HeLa cervical cancer cell line. IJCC. 2022;13(1):55–60. CrossRef

14. Handayani D, Rasyid W, Rustini, Zainudin EN, Hertiani T. Cytotoxic activity screening of fungal extracts derived from the West Sumatran Marine Sponge Haliclona fascigera to several human cell lines: Hela, WiDr, T47D and Vero. J App Pharm Sci. 2018;8(1):55–8. CrossRef

15. Sandrawati N, Pariatno R, Suharti N, Handayani D. In vitro cytotoxic activity assay of bacteria extract derived marine sponge Haliclona fascigera toward Hela, WiDr, T47D, and Vero cell line. J App Pharm Sci. 2019;9(8):66–70. CrossRef

16. Ghasemi M, Turnbull T, Sebastian S, Kempson I. The MTT assay: utility, limitations, pitfalls, and interpretation in bulk and single-cell analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(23):12827. CrossRef

17. Prayong P, Barusrux S, Weerapreeyakul N. Cytotoxic activity screening of some Indigenous Thai plants. Fitoterapia. 2008;79(7–8):598–601. CrossRef

18. Iglesias-Figueroa BF, Siqueiros-Cendón TS, Gutierrez DA, Aguilera RJ, Espinoza-Sánchez EA, Arévalo-Gallegos S, et al. Recombinant human lactoferrin induces apoptosis, disruption of F-actin structure and cell cycle arrest with selective cytotoxicity on human triple negative breast cancer cells. Apoptosis. 2019;24(7–8):562–77. CrossRef

19. Tronina T, Bartma?ska A, Pop?o?ski J, Rychlicka M, Sordon S, Filip-Psurska B, et al. Prenylated flavonoids with selective toxicity against human cancers. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(8):7408. CrossRef

20. Moordiani M, Novitasari D, Susidarti RA, Ikawati M, Kato JY, Meiyanto E. Curcumin analogs PGV-1 and CCA-1.1 induce cell cycle arrest in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells with overexpressed MYCN. Indones Biomed J. 2023;15(2):141–9. CrossRef

21. Costigan A, Hollville E, Martin SJ. Discriminating between apoptosis, necrosis, necroptosis, and ferroptosis by microscopy and flow cytometry. Curr Protoc. 2023;3(12):e951. CrossRef

22. Amalina ND, Salsabila IA, Zulfin UM, Jenie RI, Meiyanto E. In vitro synergistic effect of hesperidin and doxorubicin downregulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in highly metastatic breast cancer cells. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2023;35(1):6. CrossRef

23. Jan NU, Kifayatullah M, Amin F, Rahim H, Abbas S, Mohani SNUH, et al. Antioxidant and cytotoxic activity of steroidal alkaloids isolated from Sarcococca saligna against DPPH and HeLa cell lines. IJPER. 2022;56(2):489–96. CrossRef

24. Aristiani W, Desvita WR, Khayatulisma D, Edityaningrum CA, Guntarti A, Nurani LH. Enhancing anticancer potential: investigating the synergistic impact of doxorubicin and curcumin on HeLa and Vero cells in vitro. J Food Pharm Sci. 2024; 12(1): 52–60. CrossRef

25. Nwobodo DC, Eze PM, Okezie UM, Okafoanyali JO, Okoye FBC, Esimone CO, et al. Bioactive compounds characterization and antimicrobial potentials of crude extract of Curvularia lunata, a fungal endophyte from Elaeis guineensis. Trop J Nat Prod Res. 2022;6(3):395–402. CrossRef

26. Wang J, Lu H, Fang W, Lin M, Feng Y, Qi X, et al. Antiproliferative effects of resorcylic acid lactones from the Beibu Gulf coral-derived fungus Curvularia lunata GXIMD 02512 on prostate cancer cells. RSC Adv. 2024;14(52):38697–705. CrossRef

27. Sajer BH, Alshehri WA, Alghamdi SS, Suliman R. Extract of microbial isolates from the Western Region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and their applications in the field of health. J Contemp Med Sci. 2023;9(6):420–30. CrossRef

28. Anh CV, Kang JS, Choi BK, Lee HS, Heo CS, Shin HJ. Polyketides and meroterpenes from the marine-derived fungi Aspergillus unguis 158SC-067 and A. flocculosus 01NT-1.1.5 and their cytotoxic and antioxidant activities. Mar Drugs. 2021;19(8):415. CrossRef

29. El-Shahid ZA, Abd El-hady FK, Fayad W, Abdel-Aziz MS, Abd El-azeem EM, Ahmed EK. Antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and α-glucosidase inhibitory potentials using the one strain many compounds technique for Red Sea soft corals associated fungi’ secondary metabolites and chemical composition correlations. J Biol Act Prod Nat. 2021;11(5-6):467–89. CrossRef

30. Momtazi-Borojeni AA, Behbahani M, Sadeghi-Aliabadi H. Antiproliferative activity and apoptosis induction of crude extract and fractions of Avicennia marina. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2013;16(11):1203.

31. Perazzoli G, de los Reyes C, Pinedo-Rivilla C, Durán-Patrón R, Aleu J, Cabeza L, et al. Emericellopsis maritima and Purpureocillium lilacinum marine fungi as a source of functional fractions with antioxidant and antitumor potential in colorectal cancer: a preliminary study. J Mar Sci Eng. 2023;11(10):2024. CrossRef

32. Imreh G, Norberg HV, Imreh S, Zhivotovsky B. Chromosomal breaks during mitotic catastrophe trigger γH2AX-ATM-p53-mediated apoptosis. J Cell Sci. 2011;124(Pt 17):2951–63. CrossRef

33. Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(4):495–516. CrossRef

34. Kaczmarek A, Vandenabeele P, Krysko DV. Necroptosis: the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and its physiological relevance. Immunity. 2013;38(2):209–23. CrossRef

35. Taniguchi K, Karin M. NF-κB, inflammation, immunity and cancer: coming of age. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18(5):309–24. CrossRef

36. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death 2018. Cell Death Differentiation. 2018;25(3):486–541. CrossRef

37. Kciuk M, Gieleci?ska A, Mujwar S, Ko?at D, Ka?uzi?ska-Ko?at Z, Celik I, et al. Doxorubicin-an agent with multiple mechanisms of anticancer activity. Cells. 2023;12(4):659. CrossRef

38. Nicoletto RE, Ofner CM. Cytotoxic mechanisms of doxorubicin at clinically relevant concentrations in breast cancer cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2022;89(3):285–311. CrossRef

39. El-Seedi HR, Refaey MS, Elias N, El-Mallah MF, Albaqami FMK, Dergaa I, et al. Marine natural products as a source of novel anticancer drugs: an updated review (2019-2023). Nat Prod Bioprospect. 2025;15(1):13. CrossRef

40. Gao Y, Wang J, Meesakul P, Zhou J, Liu J, Liu S, et al. Cytotoxic compounds from marine fungi: sources, structures, and bioactivity. Mar Drugs. 2024;22(2):70. CrossRef

41. Kiontke A, Oliveira-Birkmeier A, Opitz A, Birkemeyer C. Electrospray ionization efficiency is dependent on different molecular descriptors with respect to solvent pH and instrumental configuration. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):167502. CrossRef

42. Meher AK, Chen YC. Electrospray modifications for advancing mass spectrometric analysis. Mass Spectrom (Tokyo). 2017;6:S0057. CrossRef

43. Quilico A, Panizzi L, Mugnaini E. Structure of flavoglaucin and auroglaucin. Nature. 1949;164(4157):26–7. CrossRef

44. ?wizdor A, Panek A, Milecka-Tronina N. Hydroxylative activity of Aspergillus niger towards Androst-4-ene and Androst-5-ene steroids. Steroids. 2017;126:101–6. CrossRef

45. Makhloufi H, Pinon A, Champavier Y, Saliba J, Millot M, Fruitier-Arnaudin I, et al. In vitro antiproliferative activity of echinulin derivatives from endolichenic fungus Aspergillus sp. against colorectal cancer. Molecules. 2024;29(17):4117. CrossRef

46. Niro S, Pereira E, Pélissier MA, Morfin R, Hennebert O. The DHEA metabolite 7β-hydroxy-epiandrosterone exerts anti-estrogenic effects on breast cancer cell lines. Steroids. 2012;77(5):542–51. CrossRef

47. Youssef FS, Singab ANB. An updated review on the secondary metabolites and biological activities of Aspergillus ruber and Aspergillus flavus and exploring the cytotoxic potential of their isolated compounds using virtual screening. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;1(1):8860784. CrossRef

48. Cai J, Chen C, Tan Y, Chen W, Luo X, Luo L, et al. Bioactive polyketide and diketopiperazine derivatives from the mangrove-sediment-derived fungus Aspergillus sp. SCSIO41407. Molecules. 2021;26(16):4851. CrossRef

49. Lazarevic-Pasti T, Leskovac A, Momic T, Petrovic S, Vasic V. Modulators of acetylcholinesterase activity: from Alzheimer’s disease to anti-cancer drugs. Curr Med Chem. 2017;24(30):3283–09. CrossRef

50. Ampem Danso EE, Dotse E, Aning A, Philips T, Hamidu S, Ampofo J. Anticancer and antioxidant properties of Vernonia amygdalina Delile and Citrus aurantifolia (Christm.) Swingle juice extracts: an in vitro study. Biomed Res Int. 2024;2024:9692656. CrossRef

51. Gassim HBM, Hassan AM, Abadi RSM, Mustafa YAA. Phytochemical constituents and antioxidant activity of Ricinus communis Linn leaf and seeds extracts. Sci Rad. 2024;3(2):74–88. CrossRef

52. Tao LY, Zhang JY, Liang YJ, Chen LM, Zheng LS, Wang F, et al. Anticancer effect and structure-activity analysis of marine products isolated from metabolites of mangrove Fungi in the South China Sea. Mar Drugs. 2010;8(4):1094–105. CrossRef

53. Kumari M, Taritla S, Sharma A, Jayabaskaran C. Antiproliferative and antioxidative bioactive compounds in extracts of marine-derived endophytic fungus Talaromyces purpureogenus. Front Microbiol. 2018;9: CrossRef

54. Samson RA, Visagie CM, Houbraken J, Hong SB, Hubka V, Klaassen CHW, et al. Phylogeny, identification and nomenclature of the genus Aspergillus. Stud Mycol. 2014;78:141–73. CrossRef

55. Wang Z, Zhao M, Li C, Yu Y, Gong Z, Kong F, et al. Recent advances in secondary metabolites from marine Aspergillus. Mar Drugs. 2025;23(10):400. CrossRef

56. Vadlapudi V, Borah N, Yellusani KR, Gade S, Reddy P, Rajamanikyam M, et al. Aspergillus secondary metabolite database, a resource to understand the secondary metabolome of Aspergillus genus. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07436-w

Reference

Article Metrics
34 Views 14 Downloads 48 Total

Year

Month

Related Search

By author names